Hi Peter,
On 2/11/20 5:28 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 11:25, Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> If event counters are implemented check the common events
>> required by the PMUv3 are implemented.
>>
>> Some are unconditionally required (SW_INCR, CPU_CYCLES,
>> either INST_RETIRED or INST_SPEC). Some others only are
>> required if the implementation implements some other features.
>>
>> Check those wich are unconditionally required.
>>
>> This test currently fails on TCG as neither INST_RETIRED
>> or INST_SPEC are supported.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>
>> +static bool is_event_supported(uint32_t n, bool warn)
>> +{
>> + uint64_t pmceid0 = read_sysreg(pmceid0_el0);
>> + uint64_t pmceid1 = read_sysreg_s(PMCEID1_EL0);
>> + bool supported;
>> + uint64_t reg;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The low 32-bits of PMCEID0/1 respectly describe
>> + * event support for events 0-31/32-63. Their High
>> + * 32-bits describe support for extended events
>> + * starting at 0x4000, using the same split.
>> + */
>> + if (n >= 0x0 && n <= 0x3F)
>> + reg = (pmceid0 & 0xFFFFFFFF) | ((pmceid1 & 0xFFFFFFFF) << 32);
>> + else if (n >= 0x4000 && n <= 0x403F)
>> + reg = (pmceid0 >> 32) | ((pmceid1 >> 32) << 32);
>> + else
>> + abort();
>> +
>> + supported = reg & (1UL << (n & 0x3F));
>> +
>> + if (!supported && warn)
>> + report_info("event %d is not supported", n);
>
> As with satisfy_prerequisites(), printing this with "0x%x"
> would probably be more helpful to most users.
OK
Thanks
Eric
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
