On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 02:31:53PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
[...]
> -int kvm_vm_ioctl_clear_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_clear_dirty_log *log)
> +void kvm_arch_dirty_log_tlb_flush(struct kvm *kvm,
> + struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
If it's to flush TLB for a memslot, shall we remove the "dirty_log" in
the name of the function, because it has nothing to do with dirty
logging any more? And...
> {
> - struct kvm_memslots *slots;
> - struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
> - bool flush = false;
> - int r;
> -
> - mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> -
> - r = kvm_clear_dirty_log_protect(kvm, log, &flush);
> -
> - if (flush) {
> - slots = kvm_memslots(kvm);
> - memslot = id_to_memslot(slots, log->slot);
> -
> - /* Let implementation handle TLB/GVA invalidation */
> - kvm_mips_callbacks->flush_shadow_memslot(kvm, memslot);
> - }
> -
> - mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
> - return r;
> + /* Let implementation handle TLB/GVA invalidation */
> + kvm_mips_callbacks->flush_shadow_memslot(kvm, memslot);
... This may not directly related to the current patch, but I'm
confused on why MIPS cannot use kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() to flush TLBs.
I know nothing about MIPS code, but IIUC here flush_shadow_memslot()
is a heavier operation that will also invalidate the shadow pages.
Seems to be an overkill here when we only changed write permission of
the PTEs? I tried to check the first occurance (2a31b9db15353) but I
didn't find out any clue of it so far.
But that matters to this patch because if MIPS can use
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(), then we probably don't need this
arch-specific hook any more and we can directly call
kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() after sync dirty log when flush==true.
> }
>
> long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> index 97ce6c4f7b48..0adaf4791a6d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s.c
> @@ -799,6 +799,11 @@ int kvmppc_core_check_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> return vcpu->kvm->arch.kvm_ops->check_requests(vcpu);
> }
>
> +void kvm_arch_sync_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot)
Since at it, maybe we can start to use __weak attribute for new hooks
especially when it's empty for most archs?
E.g., define:
void __weak kvm_arch_sync_dirty_log(...) {}
In the common code, then only define it again in arch that has
non-empty implementation of this method?
--
Peter Xu
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
