On 2019-12-06 11:57, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 08:58:05PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
wrote:
@@ -408,6 +410,8 @@ static void __init hyp_mode_check(void)
"CPU: CPUs started in inconsistent modes");
else
pr_info("CPU: All CPU(s) started at EL1\n");
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST))
+ kvm_compute_layout();
}
It looks like we call this unconditionally here even if the kernel
was
booted at EL1.
It has always been the case. My motivation was to be able to debug
this in a guest, because doing this on the host is... painful! ;-)
Feel free to condition it on !EL1 though.
void __init smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/va_layout.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/va_layout.c
index 2cf7d4b606c38..dab1fea4752aa 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/va_layout.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/va_layout.c
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ static u8 tag_lsb;
static u64 tag_val;
static u64 va_mask;
-static void compute_layout(void)
+__init void kvm_compute_layout(void)
{
phys_addr_t idmap_addr = __pa_symbol(__hyp_idmap_text_start);
u64 hyp_va_msb;
@@ -110,9 +110,6 @@ void __init kvm_update_va_mask(struct alt_instr
*alt,
BUG_ON(nr_inst != 5);
- if (!has_vhe() && !va_mask)
- compute_layout();
-
for (i = 0; i < nr_inst; i++) {
u32 rd, rn, insn, oinsn;
@@ -156,9 +153,6 @@ void kvm_patch_vector_branch(struct alt_instr
*alt,
return;
}
- if (!va_mask)
- compute_layout();
And here we had a few more checks.
Maybe it's still correct but asking anyway.
It should be correct. These checks were there to ensure that we only
computed
the layout once, and this now happens by construction (calling
compute_layout
from a single location instead of doing it from the patch callbacks).
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
