RE: [RFC PATCH v6 4/7] time: Add mechanism to recognize clocksource in time_get_snapshot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi tglx,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, November 7, 2019 3:56 PM
> To: Jianyong Wu (Arm Technology China) <Jianyong.Wu@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; yangbo.lu@xxxxxxx; john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx;
> pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx; sean.j.christopherson@xxxxxxxxx; maz@xxxxxxxxxx;
> richardcochran@xxxxxxxxx; Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@xxxxxxx>;
> will@xxxxxxxxxx; Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@xxxxxxx>; linux-
> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Steve Capper
> <Steve.Capper@xxxxxxx>; Kaly Xin (Arm Technology China)
> <Kaly.Xin@xxxxxxx>; Justin He (Arm Technology China)
> <Justin.He@xxxxxxx>; nd <nd@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v6 4/7] time: Add mechanism to recognize
> clocksource in time_get_snapshot
> 
> On Thu, 24 Oct 2019, Jianyong Wu wrote:
> > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > In some scenario like return device time to ptp_kvm guest, we need
> > identify the current clocksource outside core time code.
> >
> > This patch add a mechanism to recognize the current clocksource by
> > export clocksource id in time_get_snapshot.
> 
> Please check Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst and search for
> 'This patch'.
> 

Yeah, the expression should be more impersonal.

> > diff --git a/include/linux/clocksource.h b/include/linux/clocksource.h
> > index b21db536fd52..ac8016b22734 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/clocksource.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/clocksource.h
> > @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> >  #include <asm/div64.h>
> >  #include <asm/io.h>
> > +#include <linux/clocksource_ids.h>
> 
> Please place that include to the other linux includes. You might notice that
> there is ordering here.
>
Ok, 
 
> But where is that include? It's not part of that series, so how is this supposed
> to compile?

OMG! Sorry, I added this file when I prepared my patches but missed to include it into this patch! This must be avoid latter.

Thanks
Jianyong

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	tglx
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux