On 2019/8/23 22:22, Steven Price wrote:
On 23/08/2019 12:45, Zenghui Yu wrote:
Hi Steven,
On 2019/8/21 23:36, Steven Price wrote:
Enable paravirtualization features when running under a hypervisor
supporting the PV_TIME_ST hypercall.
For each (v)CPU, we ask the hypervisor for the location of a shared
page which the hypervisor will use to report stolen time to us. We set
pv_time_ops to the stolen time function which simply reads the stolen
value from the shared page for a VCPU. We guarantee single-copy
atomicity using READ_ONCE which means we can also read the stolen
time for another VCPU than the currently running one while it is
potentially being updated by the hypervisor.
Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h | 9 +-
arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c | 148 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm64/kernel/time.c | 3 +
include/linux/cpuhotplug.h | 1 +
4 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h
b/arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h
index 799d9dd6f7cc..125c26c42902 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/paravirt.h
@@ -21,6 +21,13 @@ static inline u64 paravirt_steal_clock(int cpu)
{
return pv_ops.time.steal_clock(cpu);
}
-#endif
+
+int __init kvm_guest_init(void);
+
+#else
+
+#define kvm_guest_init()
+
+#endif // CONFIG_PARAVIRT
#endif
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
index 4cfed91fe256..ea8dbbbd3293 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/paravirt.c
@@ -6,13 +6,161 @@
* Author: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*/
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) "kvmarm-pv: " fmt
+
+#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
+#include <linux/cpuhotplug.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/jump_label.h>
+#include <linux/printk.h>
+#include <linux/psci.h>
+#include <linux/reboot.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
+
#include <asm/paravirt.h>
+#include <asm/pvclock-abi.h>
+#include <asm/smp_plat.h>
struct static_key paravirt_steal_enabled;
struct static_key paravirt_steal_rq_enabled;
struct paravirt_patch_template pv_ops;
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pv_ops);
+
+struct kvmarm_stolen_time_region {
+ struct pvclock_vcpu_stolen_time *kaddr;
+};
+
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kvmarm_stolen_time_region,
stolen_time_region);
+
+static bool steal_acc = true;
+static int __init parse_no_stealacc(char *arg)
+{
+ steal_acc = false;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+early_param("no-steal-acc", parse_no_stealacc);
+
+/* return stolen time in ns by asking the hypervisor */
+static u64 kvm_steal_clock(int cpu)
+{
+ struct kvmarm_stolen_time_region *reg;
+
+ reg = per_cpu_ptr(&stolen_time_region, cpu);
+ if (!reg->kaddr) {
+ pr_warn_once("stolen time enabled but not configured for cpu
%d\n",
+ cpu);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return le64_to_cpu(READ_ONCE(reg->kaddr->stolen_time));
+}
+
+static int disable_stolen_time_current_cpu(void)
+{
+ struct kvmarm_stolen_time_region *reg;
+
+ reg = this_cpu_ptr(&stolen_time_region);
+ if (!reg->kaddr)
+ return 0;
+
+ memunmap(reg->kaddr);
+ memset(reg, 0, sizeof(*reg));
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int stolen_time_dying_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ return disable_stolen_time_current_cpu();
+}
+
+static int init_stolen_time_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
+{
+ struct kvmarm_stolen_time_region *reg;
+ struct arm_smccc_res res;
+
+ reg = this_cpu_ptr(&stolen_time_region);
+
+ arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_TIME_ST, &res);
+
+ if ((long)res.a0 < 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ reg->kaddr = memremap(res.a0,
+ sizeof(struct pvclock_vcpu_stolen_time),
+ MEMREMAP_WB);
cpuhp callbacks can be invoked in atomic context (see:
secondary_start_kernel ->
notify_cpu_starting ->
invoke callbacks),
but memremap might sleep...
Try to run a DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP enabled PV guest, I guess we will be
greeted by the Sleep-in-Atomic-Context BUG. We need an alternative
here?
Actually I had run DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP and not seen any issue. But I
think that's because of the way I've configured the region in my kvmtool
changes. I'm hitting the path where the memory region is in the linear
map of the kernel and so no actual remapping is needed and hence
memremap doesn't sleep (the shared structure is in a reserved region of
RAM).
But even changing the memory layout of the guest so the call goes into
ioremap_page_range() (which contains a might_sleep()) I'm not seeing any
problems.
Emm, I hit this SAC BUG when testing your V1 with the kvmtool changes
you've provided, but forgot to report it at that time. I go back to V1
and get the following call trace:
[ 0.120113] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
mm/slab.h:501
[ 0.120118] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 0, name: swapper/1
[ 0.120122] no locks held by swapper/1/0.
[ 0.120126] irq event stamp: 0
[ 0.120135] hardirqs last enabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[ 0.120145] hardirqs last disabled at (0): [<ffff200010113b40>]
copy_process+0x870/0x2878
[ 0.120152] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<ffff200010113b40>]
copy_process+0x870/0x2878
[ 0.120157] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<0000000000000000>] 0x0
[ 0.120164] CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 5.3.0-rc6+ #2
[ 0.120168] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[ 0.120173] Call trace:
[ 0.120179] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x250
[ 0.120184] show_stack+0x24/0x30
[ 0.120192] dump_stack+0x120/0x174
[ 0.120198] ___might_sleep+0x1b0/0x280
[ 0.120203] __might_sleep+0x80/0xf0
[ 0.120209] kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace+0x30c/0x3c8
[ 0.120216] __get_vm_area_node+0x9c/0x208
[ 0.120221] get_vm_area_caller+0x58/0x68
[ 0.120227] __ioremap_caller+0x78/0x120
[ 0.120233] ioremap_cache+0xf0/0x1a8
[ 0.120240] memremap+0x154/0x3b8
[ 0.120245] init_stolen_time_cpu+0x94/0x150
[ 0.120251] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x12c/0x12f8
[ 0.120257] notify_cpu_starting+0xa0/0xc0
[ 0.120263] secondary_start_kernel+0x1d4/0x328
But things may have changed because we're talking about V3 now...
I will dig it a bit deeper.
Am I missing something? I have to admit I don't entirely follow the
early start up - perhaps it's a simple as DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP doesn't
work this early in boot?
I think it should work.
Thanks,
zenghui
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
