On Thu, 25 Jul 2019 16:35:33 +0100 Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> > > It recently became apparent[1] that our LPI injection path is not as > efficient as it could be when injecting interrupts coming from a VFIO > assigned device. > > Although the proposed patch wasn't 100% correct, it outlined at least > two issues: > > (1) Injecting an LPI from VFIO always results in a context switch to a > worker thread: no good > > (2) We have no way of amortising the cost of translating a DID+EID pair > to an LPI number > > The reason for (1) is that we may sleep when translating an LPI, so we > do need a context process. A way to fix that is to implement a small > LPI translation cache that could be looked up from an atomic > context. It would also solve (2). > > This is what this small series proposes. It implements a very basic > LRU cache of pre-translated LPIs, which gets used to implement > kvm_arch_set_irq_inatomic. The size of the cache is currently > hard-coded at 16 times the number of vcpus, a number I have picked > under the influence of Ali Saidi. If that's not enough for you, blame > me, though. > > Does it work? well, it doesn't crash, and is thus perfect. More > seriously, I don't really have a way to benchmark it directly, so my > observations are only indirect: > > On a TX2 system, I run a 4 vcpu VM with an Ethernet interface passed > to it directly. From the host, I inject interrupts using debugfs. In > parallel, I look at the number of context switch, and the number of > interrupts on the host. Without this series, I get the same number for > both IRQ and CS (about half a million of each per second is pretty > easy to reach). With this series, the number of context switches drops > to something pretty small (in the low 2k), while the number of > interrupts stays the same. > > Yes, this is a pretty rubbish benchmark, what did you expect? ;-) > > Andre did run some benchmarks of his own, with some rather positive > results[2]. So I'm putting this out for people with real workloads to > try out and report what they see. > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1552833373-19828-1-git-send-email-yuzenghui@xxxxxxxxxx/ > [2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg742655.html > > * From v2: > > - Added invalidation on turning the ITS off > - Added invalidation on MAPC with V=0 > - Added Rb's from Eric > > * From v1: > > - Fixed race on allocation, where the same LPI could be cached multiple times > - Now invalidate the cache on vgic teardown, avoiding memory leaks > - Change patch split slightly, general reshuffling > - Small cleanups here and there > - Rebased on 5.2-rc4 > > Marc Zyngier (10): > KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Add LPI translation cache definition > KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Add __vgic_put_lpi_locked primitive > KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Add MSI-LPI translation cache invalidation > KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Invalidate MSI-LPI translation cache on > specific commands > KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Invalidate MSI-LPI translation cache on > disabling LPIs > KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Invalidate MSI-LPI translation cache on ITS > disable > KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Invalidate MSI-LPI translation cache on vgic > teardown > KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Cache successful MSI->LPI translation > KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-its: Check the LPI translation cache on MSI > injection > KVM: arm/arm64: vgic-irqfd: Implement kvm_arch_set_irq_inatomic > > include/kvm/arm_vgic.h | 3 + > virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-init.c | 5 + > virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-irqfd.c | 36 +++++- > virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 207 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c | 4 +- > virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 26 ++-- > virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h | 5 + > 7 files changed, 270 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > FWIW, I've now queued this for 5.4, with Eric's RBs and Andre's TBs. Thanks, M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
