On Fri, 2 Aug 2019 15:50:11 +0100
Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> This provides a mechanism for querying which paravirtualized features
> are available in this hypervisor.
>
> Also add the header file which defines the ABI for the paravirtualized
> clock features we're about to add.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pvclock-abi.h | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/arm-smccc.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.c | 9 +++++++++
> 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/pvclock-abi.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pvclock-abi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pvclock-abi.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1f7cdc102691
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pvclock-abi.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/* Copyright (C) 2019 Arm Ltd. */
> +
> +#ifndef __ASM_PVCLOCK_ABI_H
> +#define __ASM_PVCLOCK_ABI_H
> +
> +/* The below structures and constants are defined in ARM DEN0057A */
> +
> +struct pvclock_vcpu_stolen_time_info {
> + __le32 revision;
> + __le32 attributes;
> + __le64 stolen_time;
> + /* Structure must be 64 byte aligned, pad to that size */
> + u8 padding[48];
> +} __packed;
> +
> +#define PV_VM_TIME_NOT_SUPPORTED -1
Isn't the intent for this to be the same value as
SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED?
> +#define PV_VM_TIME_INVALID_PARAMETERS -2
It overlaps with SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED. Is that a problem? Should we
consider a spec change for this?
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> index 080012a6f025..e7f129f26ebd 100644
> --- a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
> #define ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SIP 2
> #define ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_OEM 3
> #define ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_STANDARD 4
> +#define ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_STANDARD_HYP 5
> #define ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_TRUSTED_APP 48
> #define ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_TRUSTED_APP_END 49
> #define ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_TRUSTED_OS 50
> @@ -302,5 +303,18 @@ asmlinkage void __arm_smccc_hvc(unsigned long a0, unsigned long a1,
> #define SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED -1
> #define SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED -2
>
> +/* Paravirtualised time calls (defined by ARM DEN0057A) */
> +#define ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_FEATURES \
> + ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL, \
> + ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64, \
> + ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_STANDARD_HYP, \
> + 0x20)
> +
> +#define ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_TIME_ST \
> + ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL, \
> + ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64, \
> + ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_STANDARD_HYP, \
> + 0x22)
> +
> #endif /*__ASSEMBLY__*/
> #endif /*__LINUX_ARM_SMCCC_H*/
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.c b/virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.c
> index f875241bd030..2906b2df99df 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/hypercalls.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>
> #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> +#include <asm/pvclock-abi.h>
>
> #include <kvm/arm_hypercalls.h>
> #include <kvm/arm_psci.h>
> @@ -48,6 +49,14 @@ int kvm_hvc_call_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> break;
> }
> break;
> + case ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_FEATURES:
> + val = SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS;
> + break;
> + }
> + break;
> + case ARM_SMCCC_HV_PV_FEATURES:
> + feature = smccc_get_arg1(vcpu);
> + switch (feature) {
> }
> break;
> default:
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
