Re: [RFC v2 11/14] arm64: Move the ASID allocator code in a separate file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Julien,

On 20/06/2019 14:06, Julien Grall wrote:
> We will want to re-use the ASID allocator in a separate context (e.g
> allocating VMID). So move the code in a new file.
> 
> The function asid_check_context has been moved in the header as a static
> inline function because we want to avoid add a branch when checking if the
> ASID is still valid.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/context.c b/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
> index 3df63a28856c..b745cf356fe1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/context.c
> @@ -23,46 +23,21 @@

> -#define ASID_FIRST_VERSION(info)	NUM_ASIDS(info)

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/asid.c b/arch/arm64/lib/asid.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7252e4fdd5e9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/asid.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,185 @@

> +#define ASID_FIRST_VERSION(info)	(1UL << ((info)->bits))

(oops!)


> @@ -344,7 +115,7 @@ static int asids_init(void)
>  	if (!asid_allocator_init(&asid_info, bits, ASID_PER_CONTEXT,
>  				 asid_flush_cpu_ctxt))
>  		panic("Unable to initialize ASID allocator for %lu ASIDs\n",
> -		      1UL << bits);
> +		      NUM_ASIDS(&asid_info));

Could this go in the patch that adds NUM_ASIDS()?


Thanks,

James
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux