Re: [PATCH 23/59] KVM: arm64: nv: Respect virtual HCR_EL2.TWX setting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25/06/2019 15:19, Julien Thierry wrote:
> 
> 
> On 06/21/2019 10:38 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> From: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Forward exceptions due to WFI or WFE instructions to the virtual EL2 if
>> they are not coming from the virtual EL2 and virtual HCR_EL2.TWX is set.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack.lim@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h |  2 ++
>>  arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile             |  1 +
>>  arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c        | 13 +++++++++-
>>  arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c             | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
>> index 8a3d121a0b42..645e5e11b749 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_nested.h
>> @@ -10,4 +10,6 @@ static inline bool nested_virt_in_use(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>  		test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_NESTED_VIRT, vcpu->arch.features);
>>  }
>>  
>> +int handle_wfx_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool is_wfe);
>> +
>>  #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_NESTED_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
>> index 9e450aea7db6..f11bd8b0d837 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Makefile
>> @@ -36,4 +36,5 @@ kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/irqchip.o
>>  kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += $(KVM)/arm/arch_timer.o
>>  kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_PMU) += $(KVM)/arm/pmu.o
>>  
>> +kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += nested.o
>>  kvm-$(CONFIG_KVM_ARM_HOST) += emulate-nested.o
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
>> index e348c15c81bc..ddba212fd6ec 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c
>> @@ -127,7 +127,18 @@ static int handle_no_fpsimd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>>   */
>>  static int kvm_handle_wfx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
>>  {
>> -	if (kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_WFx_ISS_WFE) {
>> +	bool is_wfe = !!(kvm_vcpu_get_hsr(vcpu) & ESR_ELx_WFx_ISS_WFE);
>> +
>> +	if (nested_virt_in_use(vcpu)) {
>> +		int ret = handle_wfx_nested(vcpu, is_wfe);
>> +
>> +		if (ret < 0 && ret != -EINVAL)
>> +			return ret;
>> +		else if (ret >= 0)
>> +			return ret;
> 
> I think you can simplify this:
> 
> 	if (ret != -EINVAL)
> 		return ret;

Ah! Yes. ;-)

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux