Re: [PATCH v9 4/5] KVM: arm/arm64: remove pmc->bitmask

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 05:50:43PM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> 
> 
> On 13/06/2019 10:39, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 08:30:51AM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> > > Hi Andrew,
> > > 
> > > On 12/06/2019 20:04, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > > > We currently use pmc->bitmask to determine the width of the pmc - however
> > > > it's superfluous as the pmc index already describes if the pmc is a cycle
> > > > counter or event counter. The architecture clearly describes the widths of
> > > > these counters.
> > > > 
> > > > Let's remove the bitmask to simplify the code.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@xxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >   include/kvm/arm_pmu.h |  1 -
> > > >   virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c    | 19 +++++++++----------
> > > >   2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > > > index b73f31baca52..2f0e28dc5a9e 100644
> > > > --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > > > +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > > > @@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
> > > >   struct kvm_pmc {
> > > >   	u8 idx;	/* index into the pmu->pmc array */
> > > >   	struct perf_event *perf_event;
> > > > -	u64 bitmask;
> > > >   };
> > > >   struct kvm_pmu {
> > > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> > > > index ae1e886d4a1a..88ce24ae0b45 100644
> > > > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> > > > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> > > > @@ -47,7 +47,10 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> > > >   		counter += perf_event_read_value(pmc->perf_event, &enabled,
> > > >   						 &running);
> > > > -	return counter & pmc->bitmask;
> > > > +	if (select_idx != ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> > > > +		counter = lower_32_bits(counter);
> > > 
> > > Shouldn't this depend on PMCR.LC as well? If PMCR.LC is clear we only
> > > want the lower 32bits of the cycle counter.
> > 
> > Yes that's correct. The hunk should look like this:
> > 
> > -       return counter & pmc->bitmask;
> > +       if (!(select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX &&
> > +             __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LC))
> > +               counter = lower_32_bits(counter);
> > +
> > +       return counter;
> 
> May be you could add a macro :
> 
> #define vcpu_pmu_counter_is_64bit(vcpu, idx) ?

Yes I think a helper would be useful - though I'd prefer the name
'kvm_pmu_idx_is_long_cycle_counter'. This seems a little clearer as
you could otherwise argue that a chained counter is also 64 bits.

Thanks,

Andrew Murray


> 
> Cheers
> Suzuki
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux