On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 10:13:19AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> We currently get following compilation warning:
>
> arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c: In function 'set_sve_vls':
> arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c:262:18: warning: passing argument 1 of 'vq_present' from incompatible pointer type
> arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c:212:13: note: expected 'const u64 (* const)[8]' but argument is of type 'u64 (*)[8]'
>
> The argument can't be const, as it is copied at runtime using
> copy_from_user(). Drop const from the prototype of vq_present().
>
> Fixes: 9033bba4b535 ("KVM: arm64/sve: Add pseudo-register for the guest's vector lengths")
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> index 3ae2f82fca46..78f5a4f45e0a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> @@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static int set_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
> #define vq_mask(vq) ((u64)1 << ((vq) - SVE_VQ_MIN) % 64)
>
> static bool vq_present(
> - const u64 (*const vqs)[KVM_ARM64_SVE_VLS_WORDS],
> + u64 (*const vqs)[KVM_ARM64_SVE_VLS_WORDS],
> unsigned int vq)
> {
> return (*vqs)[vq_word(vq)] & vq_mask(vq);
Ack, but maybe this should just be converted to a macro?
It already feels a bit like overkill for this to be a function.
Cheers
---Dave
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
