Re: mm/compaction: BUG: NULL pointer dereference

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Mel,

Thanks for your quick response.

On 24/05/2019 11:39, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 10:20:19AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
Hi,

We are hitting NULL pointer dereferences while running stress tests with KVM.
See splat [0]. The test is to spawn 100 VMs all doing standard debian
installation (Thanks to Marc's automated scripts, available here [1] ).
The problem has been reproduced with a better rate of success from 5.1-rc6
onwards.

The issue is only reproducible with swapping enabled and the entire
memory is used up, when swapping heavily. Also this issue is only reproducible
on only one server with 128GB, which has the following memory layout:

[32GB@4GB, hole , 96GB@544GB]

Here is my non-expert analysis of the issue so far.

Under extreme memory pressure, the kswapd could trigger reset_isolation_suitable()
to figure out the cached values for migrate/free pfn for a zone, by scanning through
the entire zone. On our server it does so in the range of [ 0x10_0000, 0xa00_0000 ],
with the following area of holes : [ 0x20_0000, 0x880_0000 ].
In the failing case, we end up setting the cached migrate pfn as : 0x508_0000, which
is right in the center of the zone pfn range. i.e ( 0x10_0000 + 0xa00_0000 ) / 2,
with reset_migrate = 0x88_4e00, reset_free = 0x10_0000.

Now these cached values are used by the fast_isolate_freepages() to find a pfn. However,
since we cant find anything during the search we fall back to using the page belonging
to the min_pfn (which is the migrate_pfn), without proper checks to see if that is valid
PFN or not. This is then passed on to fast_isolate_around() which tries to do :
set_pageblock_skip(page) on the page which blows up due to an NULL mem_section pointer.

The following patch seems to fix the issue for me, but I am not quite convinced that
it is the right fix. Thoughts ?


I think the patch is valid and the alternatives would be unnecessarily
complicated. During a normal scan for free pages to isolate, there
is a check for pageblock_pfn_to_page() which uses a pfn_valid check
for non-contiguous zones in __pageblock_pfn_to_page. Now, while the

I had the initial version with the pageblock_pfn_to_page(), but as you said,
it is a complicated way of perform the same check as pfn_valid().

non-contiguous check could be made in the area you highlight, it would be a
relatively small optimisation that would be unmeasurable overall. However,
it is definitely the case that if the PFN you highlight is invalid that
badness happens. If you want to express this as a signed-off patch with
an adjusted changelog then I'd be happy to add

Sure, will send it right away.


Reviewed-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Thanks.

Suzuki
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux