Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] KVM: arm/arm64: support chained PMU counters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 09:25:46AM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> It might be just my personal taste, but I'm not entirely sold on the
> introduction of get/set_perf_event. Having both this and the concept of
> getting the "canonical" pmc feels a bit redundant, or that we're
> hiding/mixing stuff.
> 
> In most cases not calling the getter/setter feels simpler, see below.

Yes this is very similar to the canonical stuff. I had a go at completely
removing the get/set_perf_event calls - I think it's better (and certainly
less code). I'll post the respin shortly. Thanks for this suggestion.

> 
> On 09/05/2019 16:32, Andrew Murray wrote:
> > ARMv8 provides support for chained PMU counters, where an event type
> > of 0x001E is set for odd-numbered counters, the event counter will
> > increment by one for each overflow of the preceding even-numbered
> > counter. Let's emulate this in KVM by creating a 64 bit perf counter
> > when a user chains two emulated counters together.
> > 
> > For chained events we only support generating an overflow interrupt
> > on the high counter. We use the attributes of the low counter to
> > determine the attributes of the perf event.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  include/kvm/arm_pmu.h |   2 +
> >  virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c    | 298 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >  2 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > index b73f31baca52..8b434745500a 100644
> > --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> >  #include <asm/perf_event.h>
> >  
> >  #define ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX		(ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS - 1)
> > +#define ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTER_PAIRS	((ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS + 1) >> 1)
> 
> Minor nit: I should have pointed that out on the previous version. To me
> it would seem more obvious to use "(ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS + 1) / 2"
> rather than shifting right. Granted that anyone reading these sources
> are likely to know that both are equivalent, but logically there are
> half the number of counter pairs than there are counters.
>

I think I'd prefer using the shift. In the unlikely event that
ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS becomes an odd value - then it's less ambiguous
how we handle it. Also we use shift throughout the code to get from the
pmc to the canonical pmc.

Thanks,

Andrew Murray
 
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_ARM_PMU
> >  
> > @@ -34,6 +35,7 @@ struct kvm_pmc {
> >  struct kvm_pmu {
> >  	int irq_num;
> >  	struct kvm_pmc pmc[ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTERS];
> > +	DECLARE_BITMAP(chained, ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTER_PAIRS);
> >  	bool ready;
> >  	bool created;
> >  	bool irq_level;
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> > index ae1e886d4a1a..6cdd9746f071 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> > @@ -25,6 +25,138 @@
> >  #include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
> >  
> >  static void kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx);
> > +
> > +#define PERF_ATTR_CFG1_KVM_PMU_CHAINED 0x1
> > +
> > +static struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_pmc_to_vcpu(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> > +{
> > +	struct kvm_pmu *pmu;
> > +	struct kvm_vcpu_arch *vcpu_arch;
> > +
> > +	pmc -= pmc->idx;
> > +	pmu = container_of(pmc, struct kvm_pmu, pmc[0]);
> > +	vcpu_arch = container_of(pmu, struct kvm_vcpu_arch, pmu);
> > +	return container_of(vcpu_arch, struct kvm_vcpu, arch);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained - determine if the pmc is chained
> > + * @pmc: The PMU counter pointer
> > + */
> > +static bool kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> > +{
> > +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = kvm_pmc_to_vcpu(pmc);
> > +
> > +	return test_bit(pmc->idx >> 1, vcpu->arch.pmu.chained);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pmu_pmc_is_high_counter - determine if select_idx is a high/low counter
> > + * @select_idx: The counter index
> > + */
> > +static bool kvm_pmu_pmc_is_high_counter(u64 select_idx)
> > +{
> > +	return select_idx & 0x1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc - obtain the canonical pmc
> > + * @pmc: The PMU counter pointer
> > + *
> > + * When a pair of PMCs are chained together we use the low counter (canonical)
> > + * to hold the underlying perf event.
> > + */
> > +static struct kvm_pmc *kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> > +{
> > +	if (kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc) &&
> > +	    kvm_pmu_pmc_is_high_counter(pmc->idx))
> > +		return pmc - 1;
> > +
> > +	return pmc;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pmu_idx_has_chain_evtype - determine if the event type is chain
> > + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> > + * @select_idx: The counter index
> > + */
> > +static bool kvm_pmu_idx_has_chain_evtype(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> > +{
> > +	u64 eventsel, reg;
> > +
> > +	select_idx |= 0x1;
> > +
> > +	if (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	reg = PMEVTYPER0_EL0 + select_idx;
> > +	eventsel = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) & ARMV8_PMU_EVTYPE_EVENT;
> > +
> > +	return armv8pmu_evtype_is_chain(eventsel);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pmu_get_perf_event - obtain a perf event from a pmc
> > + * @pmc: The PMU counter pointer
> > + *
> > + * When a pair of PMCs are chained together we obtain the perf event in
> > + * the canonical counter.
> > + */
> > +static struct perf_event *kvm_pmu_get_perf_event(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> > +{
> > +	return kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(pmc)->perf_event;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pmu_set_perf_event - set a perf event to a pmc
> > + * @pmc: The PMU counter pointer
> > + * @perf_event: The perf event
> > + *
> > + * When a pair of PMCs are chained together we set the perf event in
> > + * the canonical counter.
> > + */
> > +static void kvm_pmu_set_perf_event(struct kvm_pmc *pmc,
> > +				   struct perf_event *perf_event)
> > +{
> > +	kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(pmc)->perf_event = perf_event;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pmu_get_pair_counter_value - get PMU counter value
> > + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> > + * @pmc: The PMU counter pointer
> > + */
> > +static u64 kvm_pmu_get_pair_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > +					  struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> > +{
> > +	u64 counter, counter_high, reg, enabled, running;
> > +	struct perf_event *perf_event = kvm_pmu_get_perf_event(pmc);
> > +
> > +	if (kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc)) {
> > +		pmc = kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(pmc);
> > +		reg = PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + pmc->idx;
> > +
> > +		counter = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg);
> > +		counter_high = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg + 1);
> > +
> > +		counter = lower_32_bits(counter) | (counter_high << 32);
> > +	} else {
> > +		reg = (pmc->idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> > +		      ? PMCCNTR_EL0 : PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + pmc->idx;
> > +		counter = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg);
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * The real counter value is equal to the value of counter register plus
> > +	 * the value perf event counts.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (perf_event)
> 
> We don't reference the perf_event before this point and pmc is set to
> the counter that holds the perf event. You could just use
> "pmc->perf_event" here.
> 
> > +		counter += perf_event_read_value(perf_event, &enabled,
> > +						 &running);
> > +
> > +	return counter;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /**
> >   * kvm_pmu_get_counter_value - get PMU counter value
> >   * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> > @@ -32,20 +164,15 @@ static void kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx);
> >   */
> >  u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> >  {
> > -	u64 counter, reg, enabled, running;
> > +	u64 counter;
> >  	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> >  	struct kvm_pmc *pmc = &pmu->pmc[select_idx];
> >  
> > -	reg = (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> > -	      ? PMCCNTR_EL0 : PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + select_idx;
> > -	counter = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg);
> > +	counter = kvm_pmu_get_pair_counter_value(vcpu, pmc);
> >  
> > -	/* The real counter value is equal to the value of counter register plus
> > -	 * the value perf event counts.
> > -	 */
> > -	if (pmc->perf_event)
> > -		counter += perf_event_read_value(pmc->perf_event, &enabled,
> > -						 &running);
> > +	if (kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc) &&
> > +	    kvm_pmu_pmc_is_high_counter(select_idx))
> > +		counter >>= 32;
> >  
> >  	return counter & pmc->bitmask;
> >  }
> > @@ -74,10 +201,12 @@ void kvm_pmu_set_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx, u64 val)
> >   */
> >  static void kvm_pmu_release_perf_event(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> >  {
> > -	if (pmc->perf_event) {
> > -		perf_event_disable(pmc->perf_event);
> > -		perf_event_release_kernel(pmc->perf_event);
> > -		pmc->perf_event = NULL;
> > +	struct perf_event *perf_event = kvm_pmu_get_perf_event(pmc);
> > +
> > +	if (perf_event) {
> > +		perf_event_disable(perf_event);
> > +		perf_event_release_kernel(perf_event);
> > +		kvm_pmu_set_perf_event(pmc, NULL);
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -89,15 +218,27 @@ static void kvm_pmu_release_perf_event(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> >   */
> >  static void kvm_pmu_stop_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> >  {
> > -	u64 counter, reg;
> > +	u64 counter, counter_low, counter_high, reg;
> >  
> > -	if (pmc->perf_event) {
> > +	if (!kvm_pmu_get_perf_event(pmc))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	if (kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc)) {
> > +		pmc = kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(pmc);
> > +		counter_low = kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(vcpu, pmc->idx);
> > +		counter_high = kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(vcpu, pmc->idx + 1);
> > +
> > +		reg = PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + pmc->idx;
> > +		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) = counter_low;
> > +		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg + 1) = counter_high;
> > +	} else {
> 
> 
> What about:
> 
> 	pmc = kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(pmc);
> 	if (!pmc->perf_event)
> 		return;
> 
> 	counter = kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(vcpu, pmc->idx);
> 	if (kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc)) {
> 		reg = PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + pmc->idx;
> 
> 		/* Also update high part of the counter */
> 		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg + 1) = kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(vcpu,
> pmc->idx + 1);
> 	} else {
> 		reg = (pmc->idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX ? PMCCNTR_EL0 : PMEVCNTR0_EL0 +
> pmc->idx);
> 	}
> 
> 	/* Update counter register */
> 	__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) = counter;
> 	kvm_pmu_release_perf_event(pmc);
> 
> >  		counter = kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(vcpu, pmc->idx);
> >  		reg = (pmc->idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> >  		       ? PMCCNTR_EL0 : PMEVCNTR0_EL0 + pmc->idx;
> >  		__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) = counter;
> > -		kvm_pmu_release_perf_event(pmc);
> >  	}
> > +
> > +	kvm_pmu_release_perf_event(pmc);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -115,6 +256,8 @@ void kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  		pmu->pmc[i].idx = i;
> >  		pmu->pmc[i].bitmask = 0xffffffffUL;
> >  	}
> > +
> > +	bitmap_zero(vcpu->arch.pmu.chained, ARMV8_PMU_MAX_COUNTER_PAIRS);
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -154,6 +297,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_enable_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
> >  	int i;
> >  	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> >  	struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> > +	struct perf_event *perf_event;
> >  
> >  	if (!(__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_E) || !val)
> >  		return;
> > @@ -163,9 +307,21 @@ void kvm_pmu_enable_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
> >  			continue;
> >  
> >  		pmc = &pmu->pmc[i];
> > -		if (pmc->perf_event) {
> > -			perf_event_enable(pmc->perf_event);
> > -			if (pmc->perf_event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * For high counters of chained events we must recreate the
> > +		 * perf event with the long (64bit) attribute set.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc) &&
> > +		    kvm_pmu_pmc_is_high_counter(i)) {
> > +			kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(vcpu, i);
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		perf_event = kvm_pmu_get_perf_event(&pmu->pmc[i]);
> 
> Again, here we know that "pmu->pmc[i]" is a canonical counter.
> "pmu->pmc[i].perf_event" is sufficient.
> 
> > +		if (perf_event) {
> > +			perf_event_enable(perf_event);
> > +			if (perf_event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
> >  				kvm_debug("fail to enable perf event\n");
> >  		}
> >  	}
> > @@ -183,6 +339,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_disable_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
> >  	int i;
> >  	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> >  	struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> > +	struct perf_event *perf_event;
> >  
> >  	if (!val)
> >  		return;
> > @@ -192,8 +349,20 @@ void kvm_pmu_disable_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
> >  			continue;
> >  
> >  		pmc = &pmu->pmc[i];
> > -		if (pmc->perf_event)
> > -			perf_event_disable(pmc->perf_event);
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * For high counters of chained events we must recreate the
> > +		 * perf event with the long (64bit) attribute unset.
> > +		 */
> > +		if (kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc) &&
> > +		    kvm_pmu_pmc_is_high_counter(i)) {
> > +			kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(vcpu, i);
> > +			continue;
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		perf_event = kvm_pmu_get_perf_event(&pmu->pmc[i]);
> 
> Same thing.
> 
> > +		if (perf_event)
> > +			perf_event_disable(perf_event);
> >  	}
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -281,17 +450,6 @@ void kvm_pmu_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> >  	kvm_pmu_update_state(vcpu);
> >  }
> >  
> > -static inline struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_pmc_to_vcpu(struct kvm_pmc *pmc)
> > -{
> > -	struct kvm_pmu *pmu;
> > -	struct kvm_vcpu_arch *vcpu_arch;
> > -
> > -	pmc -= pmc->idx;
> > -	pmu = container_of(pmc, struct kvm_pmu, pmc[0]);
> > -	vcpu_arch = container_of(pmu, struct kvm_vcpu_arch, pmu);
> > -	return container_of(vcpu_arch, struct kvm_vcpu, arch);
> > -}
> > -
> >  /**
> >   * When the perf event overflows, set the overflow status and inform the vcpu.
> >   */
> > @@ -389,13 +547,20 @@ static bool kvm_pmu_counter_is_enabled(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> >  static void kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> >  {
> >  	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> > -	struct kvm_pmc *pmc = &pmu->pmc[select_idx];
> > +	struct kvm_pmc *pmc;
> >  	struct perf_event *event;
> >  	struct perf_event_attr attr;
> >  	u64 eventsel, counter, reg, data;
> >  
> > -	reg = (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> > -	      ? PMCCFILTR_EL0 : PMEVTYPER0_EL0 + select_idx;
> > +	/*
> > +	 * For chained counters the event type and filtering attributes are
> > +	 * obtained from the low/even counter. We also use this counter to
> > +	 * determine if the event is enabled/disabled.
> > +	 */
> > +	pmc = kvm_pmu_get_canonical_pmc(&pmu->pmc[select_idx]);
> > +
> > +	reg = (pmc->idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> > +	      ? PMCCFILTR_EL0 : PMEVTYPER0_EL0 + pmc->idx;
> >  	data = __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg);
> >  
> >  	kvm_pmu_stop_counter(vcpu, pmc);
> > @@ -403,34 +568,77 @@ static void kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> >  
> >  	/* Software increment event does't need to be backed by a perf event */
> >  	if (eventsel == ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_SW_INCR &&
> > -	    select_idx != ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> > +	    pmc->idx != ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX)
> >  		return;
> >  
> >  	memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(struct perf_event_attr));
> >  	attr.type = PERF_TYPE_RAW;
> >  	attr.size = sizeof(attr);
> >  	attr.pinned = 1;
> > -	attr.disabled = !kvm_pmu_counter_is_enabled(vcpu, select_idx);
> > +	attr.disabled = !kvm_pmu_counter_is_enabled(vcpu, pmc->idx);
> >  	attr.exclude_user = data & ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_EL0 ? 1 : 0;
> >  	attr.exclude_kernel = data & ARMV8_PMU_EXCLUDE_EL1 ? 1 : 0;
> >  	attr.exclude_hv = 1; /* Don't count EL2 events */
> >  	attr.exclude_host = 1; /* Don't count host events */
> > -	attr.config = (select_idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX) ?
> > +	attr.config = (pmc->idx == ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX) ?
> >  		ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_CPU_CYCLES : eventsel;
> >  
> > -	counter = kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(vcpu, select_idx);
> > -	/* The initial sample period (overflow count) of an event. */
> > -	attr.sample_period = (-counter) & pmc->bitmask;
> > +	counter = kvm_pmu_get_pair_counter_value(vcpu, pmc);
> >  
> > -	event = perf_event_create_kernel_counter(&attr, -1, current,
> > +	if (kvm_pmu_idx_has_chain_evtype(vcpu, pmc->idx)) {
> > +		/**
> > +		 * The initial sample period (overflow count) of an event. For
> > +		 * chained counters we only support overflow interrupts on the
> > +		 * high counter.
> > +		 */
> > +		attr.sample_period = (-counter) & 0xffffffffffffffffUL;
> > +		event = perf_event_create_kernel_counter(&attr, -1, current,
> > +							 kvm_pmu_perf_overflow,
> > +							 pmc + 1);
> > +
> > +		if (kvm_pmu_counter_is_enabled(vcpu, pmc->idx + 1))
> > +			attr.config1 |= PERF_ATTR_CFG1_KVM_PMU_CHAINED;
> > +	} else {
> > +		/* The initial sample period (overflow count) of an event. */
> > +		attr.sample_period = (-counter) & pmc->bitmask;
> > +		event = perf_event_create_kernel_counter(&attr, -1, current,
> >  						 kvm_pmu_perf_overflow, pmc);
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	if (IS_ERR(event)) {
> >  		pr_err_once("kvm: pmu event creation failed %ld\n",
> >  			    PTR_ERR(event));
> >  		return;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	pmc->perf_event = event;
> > +	kvm_pmu_set_perf_event(pmc, event);
> 
> You set pmc to a canonical counter at the begining of the function, so
> you could do `pmc->perf_event = event`.
> 
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * kvm_pmu_update_pmc_chained - update chained bitmap
> > + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> > + * @select_idx: The number of selected counter
> > + *
> > + * Update the chained bitmap based on the event type written in the
> > + * typer register.
> > + */
> > +static void kvm_pmu_update_pmc_chained(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
> > +{
> > +	struct kvm_pmu *pmu = &vcpu->arch.pmu;
> > +	struct kvm_pmc *pmc = &pmu->pmc[select_idx];
> > +
> > +	if (kvm_pmu_idx_has_chain_evtype(vcpu, pmc->idx)) {
> > +		/*
> > +		 * During promotion from !chained to chained we must ensure
> > +		 * the adjacent counter is stopped and its event destroyed
> > +		 */
> > +		if (!kvm_pmu_pmc_is_chained(pmc))
> > +			kvm_pmu_stop_counter(vcpu, pmc);
> > +
> > +		set_bit(pmc->idx >> 1, vcpu->arch.pmu.chained);
> > +	} else {
> > +		clear_bit(pmc->idx >> 1, vcpu->arch.pmu.chained);
> > +	}
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -452,6 +660,8 @@ void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data,
> >  	      ? PMCCFILTR_EL0 : PMEVTYPER0_EL0 + select_idx;
> >  
> >  	__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) = event_type;
> > +
> > +	kvm_pmu_update_pmc_chained(vcpu, select_idx);
> >  	kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(vcpu, select_idx);
> >  }
> >  
> > 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> Julien Thierry
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux