On 24/04/2019 10:21, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx> writes: > >> This series contains some cleanups applicable to the SVE KVM support >> patches merged into kvmarm/next. These arose from Andrew Jones' >> review. > > Does this mean these won't get merged into the original series before > the final merging upstream? I've queued these on top of the existing SVE patches. I'm quite keen on not rebasing -next at this stage. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm