Re: [PATCH 09/14] KVM: arm64/sve: Simplify KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS array sizing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 05:28:13PM +0100, Dave Martin wrote:
> A complicated DIV_ROUND_UP() expression is currently written out
> explicitly in multiple places in order to specify the size of the
> bitmap exchanged with userspace to represent the value of the
> KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_VLS pseudo-register.
> 
> To make this more readable, this patch replaces these with a single
> define.
> 
> Since the number of words in a bitmap is just the index of the last
> word used + 1, this patch expresses the bound that way instead.
> This should make it clearer what is being expressed.
> 
> Since use of DIV_ROUND_UP() was the only reason for including
> <linux/kernel.h> in guest.c, this patch removes that #include.
> 
> No functional change.
> 
> Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> index 73044e3..f025a2f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
>  #include <linux/errno.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/nospec.h>
> -#include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/stddef.h>
> @@ -209,8 +208,10 @@ static int set_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
>  #define vq_word(vq) (((vq) - SVE_VQ_MIN) / 64)
>  #define vq_mask(vq) ((u64)1 << ((vq) - SVE_VQ_MIN) % 64)
>  
> +#define SVE_VLS_WORDS (vq_word(SVE_VQ_MAX) + 1)
> +
>  static bool vq_present(
> -	const u64 (*const vqs)[DIV_ROUND_UP(SVE_VQ_MAX - SVE_VQ_MIN + 1, 64)],
> +	const u64 (*const vqs)[SVE_VLS_WORDS],
>  	unsigned int vq)
>  {
>  	return (*vqs)[vq_word(vq)] & vq_mask(vq);
> @@ -219,7 +220,7 @@ static bool vq_present(
>  static int get_sve_vls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
>  {
>  	unsigned int max_vq, vq;
> -	u64 vqs[DIV_ROUND_UP(SVE_VQ_MAX - SVE_VQ_MIN + 1, 64)];
> +	u64 vqs[SVE_VLS_WORDS];
>  
>  	if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
>  		return -ENOENT;
> @@ -243,7 +244,7 @@ static int get_sve_vls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
>  static int set_sve_vls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
>  {
>  	unsigned int max_vq, vq;
> -	u64 vqs[DIV_ROUND_UP(SVE_VQ_MAX - SVE_VQ_MIN + 1, 64)];
> +	u64 vqs[SVE_VLS_WORDS];
>  
>  	if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
>  		return -ENOENT;
> -- 
> 2.1.4
>

This is good, but I wonder if we could define the number of VLS words in
the documentation in terms of SVE_VQ_MAX too. Currently it's just the
hard coded 8 ("__u64 vector_lengths[8]").

Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux