On 15/04/2019 12:15, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Recent commits added the explicit notion of "Not affected" to the state
> of the Spectre v2 (aka. BP_HARDENING) workaround, where we just had
> "needed" and "unknown" before.
>
> Export this knowledge to the rest of the kernel and enhance the existing
> kvm_arm_harden_branch_predictor() to report this new state as well.
> Export this new state to guests when they use KVM's firmware interface
> emulation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 12 +++++++++---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 16 ++++++++++++++--
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++-----
> virt/kvm/arm/psci.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 770d73257ad9..836479e4b340 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -364,7 +364,11 @@ static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_put_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> static inline void kvm_arm_vhe_guest_enter(void) {}
> static inline void kvm_arm_vhe_guest_exit(void) {}
>
> -static inline bool kvm_arm_harden_branch_predictor(void)
> +#define KVM_BP_HARDEN_UNKNOWN -1
> +#define KVM_BP_HARDEN_NEEDED 0
> +#define KVM_BP_HARDEN_MITIGATED 1
I find the naming here a little confusing - it's not really clear what
"mitigated" means (see below).
> +
> +static inline int kvm_arm_harden_branch_predictor(void)
> {
> switch(read_cpuid_part()) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR
> @@ -372,10 +376,12 @@ static inline bool kvm_arm_harden_branch_predictor(void)
> case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A12:
> case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A15:
> case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A17:
> - return true;
> + return KVM_BP_HARDEN_NEEDED;
> #endif
> + case ARM_CPU_PART_CORTEX_A7:
> + return KVM_BP_HARDEN_MITIGATED;
> default:
> - return false;
> + return KVM_BP_HARDEN_UNKNOWN;
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 6ccdc97e5d6a..3c5b25c1bda1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -622,6 +622,12 @@ static inline bool system_uses_irq_prio_masking(void)
> cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING);
> }
>
> +#define ARM64_BP_HARDEN_UNKNOWN -1
> +#define ARM64_BP_HARDEN_NEEDED 0
> +#define ARM64_BP_HARDEN_MITIGATED 1
> +
> +int get_spectre_v2_workaround_state(void);
> +
> #define ARM64_SSBD_UNKNOWN -1
> #define ARM64_SSBD_FORCE_DISABLE 0
> #define ARM64_SSBD_KERNEL 1
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index a01fe087e022..bf9a59b7d1ce 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -555,9 +555,21 @@ static inline void kvm_arm_vhe_guest_exit(void)
> isb();
> }
>
> -static inline bool kvm_arm_harden_branch_predictor(void)
> +#define KVM_BP_HARDEN_UNKNOWN -1
> +#define KVM_BP_HARDEN_NEEDED 0
> +#define KVM_BP_HARDEN_MITIGATED 1
> +
> +static inline int kvm_arm_harden_branch_predictor(void)
> {
> - return cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR);
> + switch (get_spectre_v2_workaround_state()) {
> + case ARM64_BP_HARDEN_NEEDED:
> + return KVM_BP_HARDEN_NEEDED;
> + case ARM64_BP_HARDEN_MITIGATED:
> + return KVM_BP_HARDEN_MITIGATED;
> + case ARM64_BP_HARDEN_UNKNOWN:
> + default:
> + return KVM_BP_HARDEN_UNKNOWN;
> + }
> }
>
> #define KVM_SSBD_UNKNOWN -1
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> index a1f3188c7be0..7fa23ab09d4e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> @@ -555,6 +555,17 @@ cpu_enable_cache_maint_trap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused)
> static bool __hardenbp_enab = true;
> static bool __spectrev2_safe = true;
>
> +int get_spectre_v2_workaround_state(void)
> +{
> + if (__spectrev2_safe)
> + return ARM64_BP_HARDEN_MITIGATED;
> +
> + if (!__hardenbp_enab)
> + return ARM64_BP_HARDEN_UNKNOWN;
> +
> + return ARM64_BP_HARDEN_NEEDED;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * List of CPUs that do not need any Spectre-v2 mitigation at all.
> */
> @@ -834,13 +845,15 @@ ssize_t cpu_show_spectre_v1(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> ssize_t cpu_show_spectre_v2(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
> char *buf)
> {
> - if (__spectrev2_safe)
> + switch (get_spectre_v2_workaround_state()) {
> + case ARM64_BP_HARDEN_MITIGATED:
> return sprintf(buf, "Not affected\n");
Here "mitigated" means "not affected".
> -
> - if (__hardenbp_enab)
> + case ARM64_BP_HARDEN_NEEDED:
> return sprintf(buf, "Mitigation: Branch predictor hardening\n");
And "harden needed" means mitigated.
> -
> - return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable\n");
> + case ARM64_BP_HARDEN_UNKNOWN:
> + default:
> + return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable\n");
> + }
> }
>
> ssize_t cpu_show_spec_store_bypass(struct device *dev,
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c b/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c
> index 34d08ee63747..1da53e0e38f7 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/psci.c
> @@ -412,8 +412,16 @@ int kvm_hvc_call_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> feature = smccc_get_arg1(vcpu);
> switch(feature) {
> case ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_1:
> - if (kvm_arm_harden_branch_predictor())
> + switch (kvm_arm_harden_branch_predictor()) {
> + case KVM_BP_HARDEN_UNKNOWN:
> + break;
> + case KVM_BP_HARDEN_NEEDED:
> val = SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS;
> + break;
> + case KVM_BP_HARDEN_MITIGATED:
> + val = SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED;
Would KVM_BP_HARDEN_NOT_REQUIRED be a more logical name?
Steve
> + break;
> + }
> break;
> case ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_WORKAROUND_2:
> switch (kvm_arm_have_ssbd()) {
>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
