On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 05:14:16PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 05:09:58PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:37:25AM +0000, Andrew Murray wrote: > > > The virt/arm core allocates a kvm_cpu_context_t percpu, at present this is > > > a typedef to kvm_cpu_context and is used to store host cpu context. The > > > kvm_cpu_context structure is also used elsewhere to hold vcpu context. > > > In order to use the percpu to hold additional future host information we > > > encapsulate kvm_cpu_context in a new structure and rename the typedef and > > > percpu to match. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@xxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 ++++++-- > > > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_asm.h | 3 ++- > > > arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 16 ++++++++++------ > > > arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c | 1 + > > > virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 14 ++++++++------ > > > 5 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > As per usual, I'll need an Ack from Christoffer and/or Marc on this one :) > > Actually... given that most of this series is now firmly in KVM territory, > it probably makes more sense for the kvm/arm tree to take this on a separate > branch, which I can also pull into the arm64 perf tree if I run into > conflicts on the non-kvm parts. No problem. Thanks, Andrew Murray > > Will _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
