On Fri, 29 Mar 2019 13:00:41 +0000,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In preparation for adding logic to filter out some KVM_REG_ARM_CORE
> registers from the KVM_GET_REG_LIST output, this patch factors out
> the core register enumeration into a separate function and rebuilds
> num_core_regs() on top of it.
>
> This may be a little more expensive (depending on how good a job
> the compiler does of specialising the code), but KVM_GET_REG_LIST
> is not a hot path.
>
> This will make it easier to consolidate ID filtering code in one
> place.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@xxxxxxx>
> Tested-by: zhang.lei <zhang.lei@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
>
> Changes since v5:
>
> * New patch.
>
> This reimplements part of the separately-posted patch "KVM: arm64:
> Factor out KVM_GET_REG_LIST core register enumeration", minus aspects
> that potentially break the ABI.
>
> As a result, the opportunity to truly consolidate all the ID reg
> filtering in one place is deliberately left on the floor, for now.
> This will be addressed in a separate series later on.
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> index 3e38eb2..a391a61 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/stddef.h>
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> #include <linux/fs.h>
> @@ -194,9 +195,28 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_regs *regs)
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> +static int kvm_arm_copy_core_reg_indices(u64 __user *uindices)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> + int n = 0;
> + const u64 core_reg = KVM_REG_ARM64 | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_ARM_CORE;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < sizeof(struct kvm_regs) / sizeof(__u32); i++) {
> + if (uindices) {
> + if (put_user(core_reg | i, uindices))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + uindices++;
> + }
> +
> + n++;
> + }
> +
> + return n;
> +}
> +
> static unsigned long num_core_regs(void)
> {
> - return sizeof(struct kvm_regs) / sizeof(__u32);
> + return kvm_arm_copy_core_reg_indices(NULL);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -276,15 +296,12 @@ unsigned long kvm_arm_num_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> */
> int kvm_arm_copy_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices)
> {
> - unsigned int i;
> - const u64 core_reg = KVM_REG_ARM64 | KVM_REG_SIZE_U64 | KVM_REG_ARM_CORE;
> int ret;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < sizeof(struct kvm_regs) / sizeof(__u32); i++) {
> - if (put_user(core_reg | i, uindices))
> - return -EFAULT;
> - uindices++;
> - }
> + ret = kvm_arm_copy_core_reg_indices(uindices);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + uindices += ret;
Interesting snippet. Given that most implementations have at least one
register, this can hardly work. Please do test things with QEMU, and
not only kvmtool which obviously doesn't exercise this path.
For the sake of getting -next back to a vaguely usable state, I've now
queued the following patch on top.
M.
>From 832401c8912680ee56dc5cb6ab101266b3db416a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 03:28:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: Fix system register enumeration
The introduction of the SVE registers to userspace started with a
refactoring of the way we expose any register via the ONE_REG
interface.
Unfortunately, this change doesn't exactly behave as expected
if the number of registers is non-zero and consider everything
to be an error. The visible result is that QEMU barfs very early
when creating vcpus.
Make sure we only exit early in case there is an actual error, rather
than a positive number of registers...
be25bbb392fa ("KVM: arm64: Factor out core register ID enumeration")
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
index 086ab0508d69..4f7b26bbf671 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
@@ -604,22 +604,22 @@ int kvm_arm_copy_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices)
int ret;
ret = copy_core_reg_indices(vcpu, uindices);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret < 0)
return ret;
uindices += ret;
ret = copy_sve_reg_indices(vcpu, uindices);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret < 0)
return ret;
uindices += ret;
ret = kvm_arm_copy_fw_reg_indices(vcpu, uindices);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret < 0)
return ret;
uindices += kvm_arm_get_fw_num_regs(vcpu);
ret = copy_timer_indices(vcpu, uindices);
- if (ret)
+ if (ret < 0)
return ret;
uindices += NUM_TIMER_REGS;
--
2.20.1
--
Jazz is not dead, it just smell funny.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
