On 3/20/2019 7:48 PM, Yue Haibing wrote:
From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fix sparse warnings:
arch/arm64/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c:1732:5: warning:
symbol 'vgic_its_has_attr_regs' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm64/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c:1753:5: warning:
symbol 'vgic_its_attr_regs_access' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 10 +++++-----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
index ab3f477..a97db69 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
@@ -1729,8 +1729,8 @@ static void vgic_its_destroy(struct kvm_device *kvm_dev)
kfree(its);
}
-int vgic_its_has_attr_regs(struct kvm_device *dev,
- struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
+static int vgic_its_has_attr_regs(struct kvm_device *dev,
+ struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
{
const struct vgic_register_region *region;
gpa_t offset = attr->attr;
@@ -1750,9 +1750,9 @@ int vgic_its_has_attr_regs(struct kvm_device *dev,
return 0;
}
-int vgic_its_attr_regs_access(struct kvm_device *dev,
- struct kvm_device_attr *attr,
- u64 *reg, bool is_write)
+static int vgic_its_attr_regs_access(struct kvm_device *dev,
+ struct kvm_device_attr *attr,
+ u64 *reg, bool is_write)
{
const struct vgic_register_region *region;
struct vgic_its *its;
Acked-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cheers,
Mukesh
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
