Hi Andre, On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 9:44 AM André Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 12/03/2019 00:32, John Gong wrote: > Hi, > > > Since intid always >= VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS, > > How so? The PMU and the arch timer emulation use PPIs, so intid is > definitely < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS there. > > > so then even vcpu == NULL, it never return -EINVAL. > > I am not sure I follow. > To uniquely identify an SPI interrupt, we just need the interrupt ID > (which is always >= 32). For PPIs and SGIs, we additionally need the > vCPU ID this private interrupt belongs to, as there are multiple > interrupts with the same INTID (one per VCPU). > The VCPU ID passed in for SPIs is just a dummy value (because we use the > same function to inject private and shared interrupts), so we don't need > to check for its validity. > > Cheers, > Andre. > Thanks for your explanation. It's my fault to not consider the PPIs and SGIs injection. Sorry for polluting the mail list. Cheers, John Gong > > > > Signed-off-by: Shengmin Gong <shengmin.gong@xxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: John Gong <johngong0791@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c > > index abd9c7352677..d3cb1ce880e2 100644 > > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c > > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c > > @@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int intid, > > return ret; > > > > vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, cpuid); > > - if (!vcpu && intid < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS) > > + if (!vcpu) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > irq = vgic_get_irq(kvm, vcpu, intid); > > > _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
