On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 03:30:58PM +0000, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> On 07/01/2019 15:06, Julien Thierry wrote:
> > vgic_irq->irq_lock must always be taken with interrupts disabled as
> > it is used in interrupt context.
>
> I am a bit confused with the reason here. The code mention that ap_list_lock
> could be taken from the timer interrupt handler interrupt. I assume it
> speaks about the handler kvm_arch_timer_handler. Looking at the
> configuration of the interrupt, the flag IRQF_NO_THREAD is not set, so the
> interrupt should be threaded when CONFIG_PREEMPT_FULL is set. If my
> understanding is correct, this means the interrupt thread would sleep if it
> takes the spinlock.
>
> Did I miss anything? Do you have an exact path where the vGIC is actually
> called from an interrupt context?
The part you're missing is that percpu interrupts are not force
threaded:
static int irq_setup_forced_threading(struct irqaction *new)
{
if (!force_irqthreads)
return 0;
if (new->flags & (IRQF_NO_THREAD | IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_ONESHOT))
return 0;
/* ...*/
}
Julia
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
