On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 10:39:02PM -0700, Lance Roy wrote:
> lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements,
> since it won't get confused when someone else holds the lock. This is
> also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked().
>
> Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <ldr709@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: <kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> index 7cfdfbc910e0..50e25438fb3c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c
> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ void vgic_irq_set_phys_active(struct vgic_irq *irq, bool active)
> */
> static struct kvm_vcpu *vgic_target_oracle(struct vgic_irq *irq)
> {
> - DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&irq->irq_lock));
> + lockdep_assert_held(&irq->irq_lock);
>
> /* If the interrupt is active, it must stay on the current vcpu */
> if (irq->active)
> @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static void vgic_sort_ap_list(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
>
> - DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock));
> + lockdep_assert_held(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock);
>
> list_sort(NULL, &vgic_cpu->ap_list_head, vgic_irq_cmp);
> }
> @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ bool vgic_queue_irq_unlock(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
> {
> struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
>
> - DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&irq->irq_lock));
> + lockdep_assert_held(&irq->irq_lock);
>
> retry:
> vcpu = vgic_target_oracle(irq);
> @@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ static inline void vgic_fold_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> static inline void vgic_populate_lr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct vgic_irq *irq, int lr)
> {
> - DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&irq->irq_lock));
> + lockdep_assert_held(&irq->irq_lock);
>
> if (kvm_vgic_global_state.type == VGIC_V2)
> vgic_v2_populate_lr(vcpu, irq, lr);
> @@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ static int compute_ap_list_depth(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>
> *multi_sgi = false;
>
> - DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock));
> + lockdep_assert_held(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock);
>
> list_for_each_entry(irq, &vgic_cpu->ap_list_head, ap_list) {
> int w;
> @@ -761,7 +761,7 @@ static void vgic_flush_lr_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> bool multi_sgi;
> u8 prio = 0xff;
>
> - DEBUG_SPINLOCK_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock));
> + lockdep_assert_held(&vgic_cpu->ap_list_lock);
>
> count = compute_ap_list_depth(vcpu, &multi_sgi);
> if (count > kvm_vgic_global_state.nr_lr || multi_sgi)
> --
> 2.19.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
