Hi Suzuki,
On 26/09/18 17:32, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
Allow the arch backends to perform VM specific initialisation.
This will be later used to handle IPA size configuration and per-VM
VTCR configuration on arm64.
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 7 +++++++
arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c | 7 +++++++
virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 5 +++--
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 3ad482d2f1eb..72d46418e1ef 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -354,4 +354,11 @@ static inline void kvm_vcpu_put_sysregs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
struct kvm *kvm_arch_alloc_vm(void);
void kvm_arch_free_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
+static inline int kvm_arm_config_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
This is a bit of a nit, but VM is a bit of an overloaded term in this
context. Given what we do in the following patch (moving the global
stage-2 init to be on a per VM -- virtual machine), I'd like to rename
this to something less ambiguous.
How about kvm_arm_config_stage2? Or something along those lines?
No need to respin the series on this account, we can address it in a
separate patch. But I think it would help understanding what is done where.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
