On 23/07/18 10:44, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: > On 07/22/2018 04:53 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 10:18:45AM +0100, Suzuki K Poulose wrote: >>> Legacy PCI over virtio uses a 32bit PFN for the queue. If the >>> queue pfn is too large to fit in 32bits, which we could hit on >>> arm64 systems with 52bit physical addresses (even with 64K page >>> size), we simply miss out a proper link to the other side of >>> the queue. >>> >>> Add a check to validate the PFN, rather than silently breaking >>> the devices. >>> >>> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Peter Maydel <peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> Cc: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@xxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@xxxxxxx> >> >> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Michael, > > Thanks. > >> >> I assume this will be merged through some other tree. >> > > > As such these two virtio patches do not have any code dependencies with > the rest of the series. So, if you could pick this up it should be fine. > Otherwise, may be Marc can push it with the rest of the series. > > Marc, > > Are you OK with that ? Given that these two patches completely independent, I think their natural path should be the virtio tree. But if Michael doesn't want to pick them, I'll do it as part of this series. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
