Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] KVM: arm64: Support handling access faults for PUD hugepages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/07/18 15:41, Punit Agrawal wrote:
In preparation for creating larger hugepages at Stage 2, extend the
access fault handling at Stage 2 to support PUD hugepages when
encountered.

Provide trivial helpers for arm32 to allow sharing of code.

Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx>
---
  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h   |  8 ++++++++
  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h |  7 +++++++
  arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h |  6 ++++++
  virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c               | 29 ++++++++++++++++-------------
  4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
index d05c8986e495..a4298d429efc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
@@ -78,6 +78,8 @@ void kvm_clear_hyp_idmap(void);
  #define kvm_pfn_pte(pfn, prot)	pfn_pte(pfn, prot)
  #define kvm_pfn_pmd(pfn, prot)	pfn_pmd(pfn, prot)
+#define kvm_pud_pfn(pud) (((pud_val(pud) & PUD_MASK) & PHYS_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT)

Since we don't have PUD in arm32, it would be good to trigger a BUG()
instead of silently doing something wrong.

@@ -102,6 +104,12 @@ static inline bool kvm_s2pud_exec(pud_t *pud)
  	return false;
  }
+static inline pud_t kvm_s2pud_mkyoung(pud_t pud)
+{
+	BUG();
+	return pud;
+}
+

Like this. ^

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
index e73909a31e02..d2c705e31584 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
@@ -1637,33 +1637,36 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
   */
  static void handle_access_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa)
  {
-	pmd_t *pmd;
-	pte_t *pte;
+	pud_t *pud = NULL;
+	pmd_t *pmd = NULL;
+	pte_t *pte = NULL;
  	kvm_pfn_t pfn;
-	bool pfn_valid = false;
+	bool found, pfn_valid = false;

nit: You could use pfn_valid instead of a new "found" variable.

trace_kvm_access_fault(fault_ipa); spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock); - pmd = stage2_get_pmd(vcpu->kvm, NULL, fault_ipa);
-	if (!pmd || pmd_none(*pmd))	/* Nothing there */
+	found = stage2_get_leaf_entry(vcpu->kvm, fault_ipa, &pud, &pmd, &pte);
+	if (!found)
  		goto out;
- if (pmd_thp_or_huge(*pmd)) { /* THP, HugeTLB */
+	if (pud) {		/* HugeTLB */
+		*pud = kvm_s2pud_mkyoung(*pud);
+		pfn = kvm_pud_pfn(*pud);
+		pfn_valid = true;
+		goto out;

You don't need these goto's and the out lable anymore.

+	} else 	if (pmd) {	/* THP, HugeTLB */
  		*pmd = pmd_mkyoung(*pmd);
  		pfn = pmd_pfn(*pmd);
  		pfn_valid = true;
  		goto out;
+	} else {
+		*pte = pte_mkyoung(*pte);	/* Just a page... */
+		pfn = pte_pfn(*pte);
+		pfn_valid = true;
  	}
- pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, fault_ipa);
-	if (pte_none(*pte))		/* Nothing there either */
-		goto out;
-
-	*pte = pte_mkyoung(*pte);	/* Just a page... */
-	pfn = pte_pfn(*pte);
-	pfn_valid = true;
  out:
  	spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
  	if (pfn_valid)


Otherwise look good to me.

Suzuki
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux