Re: [RFC PATCH 05/16] KVM: arm: Add arch init/uninit hooks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx> writes:

> In preparation for adding support for SVE in guests on arm64, hooks
> for allocating and freeing additional per-vcpu memory are needed.
>
> kvm_arch_vcpu_setup() could be used for allocation, but this
> function is not clearly balanced by un "unsetup" function, making

Isn't that a double negative there? Surely it would be balanced by a
kvm_arch_vcpu_unsetup() or possibly better named function.

> it unclear where memory allocated in this function should be freed.
>
> To keep things simple, this patch defines backend hooks
> kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_{,un}unint(), and plumbs them in appropriately.

Is {,un} a notation for dropping un? This might be why I'm confused. I
would have written it as kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_[un]init() or even
kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_[init|uninit].

> The exusting kvm_arch_vcpu_init() function now calls

/existing/

> kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_init(), while an explicit kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit()
> is added which current does nothing except to call
> kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_uninit().

OK I'm a little confused by this. It seems to me that KVM already has
the provision for an init/uninit. What does the extra level on
indirection buy you that keeping the static inline
kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_uninit in arm/kvm_host.h and a concrete implementation
in arm64/kvm/guest.c doesn't?

>
> The backend functions are currently defined to do nothing.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h   |  4 +++-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  4 +++-
>  virt/kvm/arm/arm.c                | 13 ++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 1f1fe410..9b902b8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -284,10 +284,12 @@ struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_mpidr_to_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long mpidr);
>  static inline bool kvm_arch_check_sve_has_vhe(void) { return true; }
>  static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arch_sync_events(struct kvm *kvm) {}
> -static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_block_finish(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>
> +static inline int kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return 0; }
> +static inline void kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> +
>  static inline void kvm_arm_init_debug(void) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 92d6e88..9671ddd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -425,10 +425,12 @@ static inline bool kvm_arch_check_sve_has_vhe(void)
>
>  static inline void kvm_arch_hardware_unsetup(void) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arch_sync_events(struct kvm *kvm) {}
> -static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arch_sched_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arch_vcpu_block_finish(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>
> +static inline int kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) { return 0; }
> +static inline void kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> +
>  void kvm_arm_init_debug(void);
>  void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index 04e554c..66f15cc 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -345,6 +345,8 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
>  int kvm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> +	int ret;
> +
>  	/* Force users to call KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT */
>  	vcpu->arch.target = -1;
>  	bitmap_zero(vcpu->arch.features, KVM_VCPU_MAX_FEATURES);
> @@ -354,7 +356,16 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
>  	kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(vcpu);
>
> -	return kvm_vgic_vcpu_init(vcpu);
> +	ret = kvm_vgic_vcpu_init(vcpu);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	return kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_init(vcpu);
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_arch_vcpu_uninit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	kvm_arm_arch_vcpu_uninit(vcpu);
>  }
>
>  void kvm_arch_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int cpu)


--
Alex Bennée
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm




[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux