On 18/05/18 18:40, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 10:30 AM Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> I'm going to ask the question I've asked before when this patch cropped >> up (must be the 4th time now): > >> Is it guaranteed that this is the only case where LLVM/clang is going to >> generate absolute addresses instead of using relative addressing? > > It seems like if there's requirements that only relative addressing be > used, then the compiler should be told explicitly about this restriction, > no? Certainly. What's the rune? M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
