On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 03:54:06PM +0100, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> The code for operations such as marking the pfn as dirty, and
> dcache/icache maintenance during stage 2 fault handling is duplicated
> between normal pages and PMD hugepages.
>
> Instead of creating another copy of the operations when we introduce
> PUD hugepages, let's share them across the different pagesizes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> index 7f6a944db23d..db382c7c7cd7 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/mmu.c
> @@ -1428,7 +1428,7 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
> kvm_pfn_t pfn;
> pgprot_t mem_type = PAGE_S2;
> bool logging_active = memslot_is_logging(memslot);
> - unsigned long flags = 0;
> + unsigned long vma_pagesize, flags = 0;
>
> write_fault = kvm_is_write_fault(vcpu);
> exec_fault = kvm_vcpu_trap_is_iabt(vcpu);
> @@ -1448,7 +1448,8 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
> return -EFAULT;
> }
>
> - if (vma_kernel_pagesize(vma) == PMD_SIZE && !logging_active) {
> + vma_pagesize = vma_kernel_pagesize(vma);
> + if (vma_pagesize == PMD_SIZE && !logging_active) {
> hugetlb = true;
> gfn = (fault_ipa & PMD_MASK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> } else {
> @@ -1517,23 +1518,33 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
> if (mmu_notifier_retry(kvm, mmu_seq))
> goto out_unlock;
>
> - if (!hugetlb && !force_pte)
> + if (!hugetlb && !force_pte) {
> + /*
> + * Only PMD_SIZE transparent hugepages(THP) are
> + * currently supported. This code will need to be
> + * updated if other THP sizes are supported.
> + */
> hugetlb = transparent_hugepage_adjust(&pfn, &fault_ipa);
> + vma_pagesize = PMD_SIZE;
> + }
> +
> + if (writable)
> + kvm_set_pfn_dirty(pfn);
> +
> + if (fault_status != FSC_PERM)
> + clean_dcache_guest_page(pfn, vma_pagesize);
> +
> + if (exec_fault)
> + invalidate_icache_guest_page(pfn, vma_pagesize);
>
> if (hugetlb) {
> pmd_t new_pmd = pfn_pmd(pfn, mem_type);
> new_pmd = pmd_mkhuge(new_pmd);
> - if (writable) {
> + if (writable)
> new_pmd = kvm_s2pmd_mkwrite(new_pmd);
> - kvm_set_pfn_dirty(pfn);
> - }
> -
> - if (fault_status != FSC_PERM)
> - clean_dcache_guest_page(pfn, PMD_SIZE);
>
> if (exec_fault) {
> new_pmd = kvm_s2pmd_mkexec(new_pmd);
> - invalidate_icache_guest_page(pfn, PMD_SIZE);
> } else if (fault_status == FSC_PERM) {
This could now be rewritten to:
if (exec_fault ||
(fault_status == FSC_PERM && stage2_is_exec(kvm, fault_ipa)))
new_pmd = kvm_s2pmd_mkexec(new_pmd);
which we could even consider making
static bool stage2_should_exec(struct kvm *kvm, phys_addr_t addr,
bool exec_fault, unsigned long fault_status)
{
/*
* If we took an execution fault we will have made the
* icache/dcache coherent and should now let the s2 mapping be
* executable.
*
* Write faults (!exec_fault && FSC_PERM) are orthogonal to
* execute permissions, and we preserve whatever we have.
*/
return exec_fault ||
(fault_status == FSC_PERM && stage2_is_exec(kvm, fault_ipa));
}
The benefit would be to have this documentation in a single place and
slightly simply both the hugetlb and !hugetlb blocks.
> /* Preserve execute if XN was already cleared */
> if (stage2_is_exec(kvm, fault_ipa))
> @@ -1546,16 +1557,11 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>
> if (writable) {
> new_pte = kvm_s2pte_mkwrite(new_pte);
> - kvm_set_pfn_dirty(pfn);
> mark_page_dirty(kvm, gfn);
> }
>
> - if (fault_status != FSC_PERM)
> - clean_dcache_guest_page(pfn, PAGE_SIZE);
> -
> if (exec_fault) {
> new_pte = kvm_s2pte_mkexec(new_pte);
> - invalidate_icache_guest_page(pfn, PAGE_SIZE);
> } else if (fault_status == FSC_PERM) {
> /* Preserve execute if XN was already cleared */
> if (stage2_is_exec(kvm, fault_ipa))
> --
> 2.17.0
>
Notwithstanding my suggestion above:
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
