On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 09:52:19AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Shanker Donthineni > <shankerd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h > > index bb26382..6ecc249 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h > > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h > > @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ > > #define ARM64_SVE 22 > > #define ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0 23 > > #define ARM64_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR 24 > > -#define ARM64_HARDEN_BP_POST_GUEST_EXIT 25 > > +/* #define ARM64_UNALLOCATED_ENTRY 25 */ > > Why not just delete the entry? Deleting the entry, and renumbering subsequent entries is the right thing to do. > Is ARM64_NCAPS never supposed to get smaller? It's internal to the kernel, and it makes sense to keep it as small as possible. There are datastructures allocated for each entry, like the static key array. Thanks, Mark. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
