Re: [PATCH 01/11] ACPI / APEI: Move the estatus queue code up, and under its own ifdef

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 06:02:21PM +0000, James Morse wrote:
> Sure. I reckon your English grammar is better than mine, is this better?:

Bah, you must be joking :-)

> | In any NMI-like handler, memory from ghes_estatus_pool is used to save
> | estatus, and added to the ghes_estatus_llist. irq_work_queue() causes
> | ghes_proc_in_irq() to run in IRQ context where each estatus in
> | ghes_estatus_llist are processed. Each NMI-like error source must grow

s/are/is/ reads better to me, for some reason :)

> | the ghes_estatus_pool to ensure memory is available.

Other than that, yap, much better!

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux