Re: [PATCH v6 01/13] arm64: cpufeature: __this_cpu_has_cap() shouldn't stop early

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 07:38:54PM +0000, James Morse wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 9ef84d0def9a..d88cd0e88606 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -1303,8 +1303,8 @@ static bool __this_cpu_has_cap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap_array,
>  	if (WARN_ON(preemptible()))
>  		return false;
>  
> -	for (caps = cap_array; caps->desc; caps++)
> -		if (caps->capability == cap && caps->matches)
> +	for (caps = cap_array; caps->matches; caps++)
> +		if (caps->capability == cap)
>  			return caps->matches(caps, SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU);
>  
>  	return false;

Just to make sure I applied this correctly on top of for-next/core:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index a11311397430..630a40ec1332 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -1149,9 +1149,8 @@ static bool __this_cpu_has_cap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *cap_array,
 	if (WARN_ON(preemptible()))
 		return false;
 
-	for (caps = cap_array; caps->desc; caps++)
+	for (caps = cap_array; caps->matches; caps++)
 		if (caps->capability == cap &&
-		    caps->matches &&
 		    caps->matches(caps, SCOPE_LOCAL_CPU))
 			return true;
 	return false;
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux