Re: [PATCH v6 03/13] arm64: cpufeature: Detect CPU RAS Extentions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi James,

On 2018/1/16 3:38, James Morse wrote:
> From: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ARM's v8.2 Extentions add support for Reliability, Availability and
> Serviceability (RAS). On CPUs with these extensions system software
> can use additional barriers to isolate errors and determine if faults
> are pending. Add cpufeature detection.
> 
> Platform level RAS support may require additional firmware support.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@xxxxxxxxxx>
> [Rebased added config option, reworded commit message]
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v4:
>  * Removed barrier in context switch
> 
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig               | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h |  3 ++-
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h  |  2 ++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c   | 13 +++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 664fadc2aa2e..1d51c8edf34b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -1062,6 +1062,22 @@ config ARM64_PMEM
>  	  operations if DC CVAP is not supported (following the behaviour of
>  	  DC CVAP itself if the system does not define a point of persistence).
>  
> +config ARM64_RAS_EXTN
> +	bool "Enable support for RAS CPU Extensions"
> +	default y
> +	help
> +	  CPUs that support the Reliability, Availability and Serviceability
> +	  (RAS) Extensions, part of ARMv8.2 are able to track faults and
> +	  errors, classify them and report them to software.
> +
> +	  On CPUs with these extensions system software can use additional
> +	  barriers to determine if faults are pending and read the
> +	  classification from a new set of registers.
> +
> +	  Selecting this feature will allow the kernel to use these barriers
> +	  and access the new registers if the system supports the extension.
> +	  Platform RAS features may additionally depend on firmware support.
> +
>  endmenu
>  
it seems this "CONFIG_ARM64_RAS_EXTN" is not enabled in the "arch/arm64/configs/defconfig",
if not, I want to enable this config to enable RAS feature in the defconfig. do you agree?
thanks

>  config ARM64_SVE
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
> index 7049b4802587..bb263820de13 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h
> @@ -44,7 +44,8 @@
>  #define ARM64_UNMAP_KERNEL_AT_EL0		23
>  #define ARM64_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR		24
>  #define ARM64_HARDEN_BP_POST_GUEST_EXIT		25
> +#define ARM64_HAS_RAS_EXTN			26
>  
> -#define ARM64_NCAPS				26
> +#define ARM64_NCAPS				27
>  
>  #endif /* __ASM_CPUCAPS_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> index 1a8108f84932..321622e9f9c3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h
> @@ -498,6 +498,7 @@
>  #define ID_AA64PFR0_CSV3_SHIFT		60
>  #define ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT		56
>  #define ID_AA64PFR0_SVE_SHIFT		32
> +#define ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_SHIFT		28
>  #define ID_AA64PFR0_GIC_SHIFT		24
>  #define ID_AA64PFR0_ASIMD_SHIFT		20
>  #define ID_AA64PFR0_FP_SHIFT		16
> @@ -507,6 +508,7 @@
>  #define ID_AA64PFR0_EL0_SHIFT		0
>  
>  #define ID_AA64PFR0_SVE			0x1
> +#define ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_V1		0x1
>  #define ID_AA64PFR0_FP_NI		0xf
>  #define ID_AA64PFR0_FP_SUPPORTED	0x0
>  #define ID_AA64PFR0_ASIMD_NI		0xf
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index d88cd0e88606..0c0af18121e1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64pfr0[] = {
>  	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_CSV3_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>  	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_CSV2_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>  	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_SVE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>  	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_GIC_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>  	S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_ASIMD_SHIFT, 4, ID_AA64PFR0_ASIMD_NI),
>  	S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64PFR0_FP_SHIFT, 4, ID_AA64PFR0_FP_NI),
> @@ -1028,6 +1029,18 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
>  		.enable = sve_kernel_enable,
>  	},
>  #endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_SVE */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_RAS_EXTN
> +	{
> +		.desc = "RAS Extension Support",
> +		.capability = ARM64_HAS_RAS_EXTN,
> +		.def_scope = SCOPE_SYSTEM,
> +		.matches = has_cpuid_feature,
> +		.sys_reg = SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1,
> +		.sign = FTR_UNSIGNED,
> +		.field_pos = ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_SHIFT,
> +		.min_field_value = ID_AA64PFR0_RAS_V1,
> +	},
> +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM64_RAS_EXTN */
>  	{},
>  };
>  
> 

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux