Re: [PATCH v4 03/19] arm64: asm-offsets: Remove potential circular dependency

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 06:43:18PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> So far, we've been lucky enough that none of the include files
> that asm-offsets.c requires include asm-offsets.h. This is
> about to change, and would introduce a nasty circular dependency...
> 
> Let's now guard the inclusion of asm-offsets.h so that it never
> gets pulled from asm-offsets.c. The same issue exists between
> bounce.c and include/generated/bounds.h, and is worked around
> by using the existing guard symbol.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-offsets.h | 2 ++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c      | 2 ++
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-offsets.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-offsets.h
> index d370ee36a182..7d6531a81eb3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-offsets.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/asm-offsets.h
> @@ -1 +1,3 @@
> +#if !defined(__GENERATING_ASM_OFFSETS_H) && !defined(__GENERATING_BOUNDS_H)

I don't understand why we need to check __GENERATING_BOUNDS_H here?
What is the interaction between asm-offsets and bounds?

Thanks,
-Christoffer
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux