On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 10:50:38AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > My question is mainly: why not just use copy_*() everywhere instead? > Having these things so spread out makes it fragile, and there's very > little performance benefit from using __copy_*() over copy_*(). I think that's more of a general question. Why not just remove the __ versions from the kernel entirely if they're not worth the perf? Will _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
