Hi,
On 20/11/17 19:16, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> The __this_cpu_read() and __this_cpu_write() functions already implement
> checks for the required preemption levels when using
> CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT which gives you nice error messages and such.
> Therefore there is no need to explicitly check this using a BUG_ON() in
> the code (which we don't do for other uses of per cpu variables either).
>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> index c13d74c083fe..28548aeaf164 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arm.c
> @@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned char, kvm_arm_hardware_enabled);
>
> static void kvm_arm_set_running_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - BUG_ON(preemptible());
> __this_cpu_write(kvm_arm_running_vcpu, vcpu);
> }
>
> @@ -81,7 +80,6 @@ static void kvm_arm_set_running_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> */
> struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_arm_get_running_vcpu(void)
> {
> - BUG_ON(preemptible());
> return __this_cpu_read(kvm_arm_running_vcpu);
> }
>
>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
