Hi, On 27/10/17 09:34, Christoffer Dall wrote: > If the vgic is not initialized, don't try to grab its spinlocks or > traverse its data structures. > > This is important because we soon have to start considering the active > state of a virtual interrupts when doing vcpu_load, which may happen > early on before the vgic is initialized. I understand this patch is on its way to Linus already, but I just found this by browsing for VGIC changes... > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> > --- > virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c > index fed717e..e1f7dbc 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.c > @@ -777,6 +777,9 @@ bool kvm_vgic_map_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int virt_irq) > struct vgic_irq *irq = vgic_get_irq(vcpu->kvm, vcpu, virt_irq); Isn't vgic_get_irq() already accessing VGIC data structures? In which case this assignment should be moved after the vgic_initialized() check below? Cheers, Andre. > bool map_is_active; > > + if (!vgic_initialized(vcpu->kvm)) > + return false; > + > spin_lock(&irq->irq_lock); > map_is_active = irq->hw && irq->active; > spin_unlock(&irq->irq_lock); > _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
