On Wed, Oct 25 2017 at 6:48:27 pm BST, Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 04:33:52PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> When the VLPI gets mapped, it must inherit the configuration of
>> the LPI configured at the vITS level. For that purpose, let's make
>> update_lpi_config globally available and call it just after
>> having performed the VLPI map operation.
>>
>> Acked-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 6 ++----
>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c | 2 ++
>> virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic.h | 2 ++
>> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> index eb72eb027060..f434748439ee 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c
>> @@ -37,8 +37,6 @@
>> static int vgic_its_save_tables_v0(struct vgic_its *its);
>> static int vgic_its_restore_tables_v0(struct vgic_its *its);
>> static int vgic_its_commit_v0(struct vgic_its *its);
>> -static int update_lpi_config(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
>> - struct kvm_vcpu *filter_vcpu, bool needs_inv);
>>
>> /*
>> * Creates a new (reference to a) struct vgic_irq for a given LPI.
>> @@ -272,8 +270,8 @@ static struct its_collection *find_collection(struct vgic_its *its, int coll_id)
>> * If filter_vcpu is not NULL, applies only if the IRQ is targeting this
>> * VCPU. Unconditionally applies if filter_vcpu is NULL.
>> */
>> -static int update_lpi_config(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
>> - struct kvm_vcpu *filter_vcpu, bool needs_inv)
>> +int update_lpi_config(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_irq *irq,
>> + struct kvm_vcpu *filter_vcpu, bool needs_inv)
>> {
>> u64 propbase = GICR_PROPBASER_ADDRESS(kvm->arch.vgic.propbaser);
>> u8 prop;
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
>> index ba1dd3162eba..b79a0450bb1c 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-v4.c
>> @@ -147,6 +147,8 @@ int kvm_vgic_v4_set_forwarding(struct kvm *kvm, int virq,
>> irq->hw = true;
>> irq->host_irq = virq;
>>
>> + /* Force the property update and invalidate */
>> + update_lpi_config(kvm, irq, NULL, true);
>
> Actually, when re-reading this patch, this looks weird to me.
>
> I think this needs to either be done as part of the map, or before the
> map, to prevent for example a disabled interrupt from the guest'ss PoV
> to fire when it doesn't expect it.
Indeed, that's a good point. I don't really like making it part of the
VLPI mapping, as this is an ITS thing (and the property update is more a
redistributor concept), but moving it it before the map is probably the
best thing to do. Thanks for pointing this out!
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
