On Fri, Oct 20 2017 at 1:49:29 pm BST, Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx> > > We were using the same hrtimer for emulating the physical timer and for > making sure a blocking VCPU thread would be eventually woken up. That > worked fine in the previous arch timer design, but as we are about to > actually use the soft timer expire function for the physical timer > emulation, change the logic to use a dedicated hrtimer. > > This has the added benefit of not having to cancel any work in the sync > path, which in turn allows us to run the flush and sync with IRQs > disabled. > > Note that the hrtimer used to program the host kernel's timer to > generate an exit from the guest when the emulated physical timer fires > never has to inject any work, and to share the soft_timer_cancel() > function with the bg_timer, we change the function to only cancel any > pending work if the pointer to the work struct is not null. > > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
