On Sat, Sep 23 2017 at 2:42:05 am BST, Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > There is no need to schedule and cancel a hrtimer when entering and > exiting the guest, because we know when the physical timer is going to > fire when the guest programs it, and we can simply program the hrtimer > at that point. > > Now when the register modifications from the guest go through the > kvm_arm_timer_set/get_reg functions, which always call > kvm_timer_update_state(), we can simply consider the timer state in this > function and schedule and cancel the timers as needed. > > This avoids looking at the physical timer emulation state when entering > and exiting the VCPU, allowing for faster servicing of the VM when > needed. > > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <cdall@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c > index 1f82c21..aa18a5d 100644 > --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c > +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c > @@ -199,7 +199,27 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart kvm_bg_timer_expire(struct hrtimer *hrt) > > static enum hrtimer_restart kvm_phys_timer_expire(struct hrtimer *hrt) > { > - WARN(1, "Timer only used to ensure guest exit - unexpected event."); > + struct arch_timer_context *ptimer; > + struct arch_timer_cpu *timer; > + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu; > + u64 ns; > + > + timer = container_of(hrt, struct arch_timer_cpu, phys_timer); > + vcpu = container_of(timer, struct kvm_vcpu, arch.timer_cpu); > + ptimer = vcpu_ptimer(vcpu); > + > + /* > + * Check that the timer has really expired from the guest's > + * PoV (NTP on the host may have forced it to expire > + * early). If not ready, schedule for a later time. > + */ > + ns = kvm_timer_compute_delta(ptimer); > + if (unlikely(ns)) { > + hrtimer_forward_now(hrt, ns_to_ktime(ns)); > + return HRTIMER_RESTART; > + } Don't we already have a similar logic for the background timer (I must admit I've lost track of how we changed things in this series)? If so, can we make this common code? > + > + kvm_timer_update_irq(vcpu, true, ptimer); > return HRTIMER_NORESTART; > } > > @@ -253,24 +273,28 @@ static void kvm_timer_update_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool new_level, > } > > /* Schedule the background timer for the emulated timer. */ > -static void phys_timer_emulate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > - struct arch_timer_context *timer_ctx) > +static void phys_timer_emulate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > struct arch_timer_cpu *timer = &vcpu->arch.timer_cpu; > + struct arch_timer_context *ptimer = vcpu_ptimer(vcpu); > > - if (kvm_timer_should_fire(timer_ctx)) > - return; > - > - if (!kvm_timer_irq_can_fire(timer_ctx)) > + /* > + * If the timer can fire now we have just raised the IRQ line and we > + * don't need to have a soft timer scheduled for the future. If the > + * timer cannot fire at all, then we also don't need a soft timer. > + */ > + if (kvm_timer_should_fire(ptimer) || !kvm_timer_irq_can_fire(ptimer)) { > + soft_timer_cancel(&timer->phys_timer, NULL); > return; > + } > > - /* The timer has not yet expired, schedule a background timer */ > - soft_timer_start(&timer->phys_timer, kvm_timer_compute_delta(timer_ctx)); > + soft_timer_start(&timer->phys_timer, kvm_timer_compute_delta(ptimer)); > } > > /* > - * Check if there was a change in the timer state (should we raise or lower > - * the line level to the GIC). > + * Check if there was a change in the timer state, so that we should either > + * raise or lower the line level to the GIC or schedule a background timer to > + * emulate the physical timer. > */ > static void kvm_timer_update_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > @@ -292,6 +316,8 @@ static void kvm_timer_update_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > if (kvm_timer_should_fire(ptimer) != ptimer->irq.level) > kvm_timer_update_irq(vcpu, !ptimer->irq.level, ptimer); > + > + phys_timer_emulate(vcpu); > } > > static void vtimer_save_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > @@ -445,6 +471,9 @@ void kvm_timer_vcpu_load(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > if (has_vhe()) > disable_el1_phys_timer_access(); > + > + /* Set the background timer for the physical timer emulation. */ > + phys_timer_emulate(vcpu); > } > > bool kvm_timer_should_notify_user(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > @@ -480,12 +509,6 @@ void kvm_timer_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > if (unlikely(!timer->enabled)) > return; > - > - if (kvm_timer_should_fire(ptimer) != ptimer->irq.level) > - kvm_timer_update_irq(vcpu, !ptimer->irq.level, ptimer); > - > - /* Set the background timer for the physical timer emulation. */ > - phys_timer_emulate(vcpu, vcpu_ptimer(vcpu)); > } > > void kvm_timer_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > @@ -500,6 +523,17 @@ void kvm_timer_vcpu_put(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > vtimer_save_state(vcpu); > > + /* > + * Cancel the physical timer emulation, because the only case where we > + * need it after a vcpu_put is in the context of a sleeping VCPU, and > + * in that case we already factor in the deadline for the physical > + * timer when scheduling the bg_timer. > + * > + * In any case, we re-schedule the hrtimer for the physical timer when > + * coming back to the VCPU thread in kvm_timer_vcpu_load(). > + */ > + soft_timer_cancel(&timer->phys_timer, NULL); > + > set_cntvoff(0); > } > > @@ -536,16 +570,9 @@ static void unmask_vtimer_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > */ > void kvm_timer_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > { > - struct arch_timer_cpu *timer = &vcpu->arch.timer_cpu; > struct arch_timer_context *vtimer = vcpu_vtimer(vcpu); > > /* > - * This is to cancel the background timer for the physical timer > - * emulation if it is set. > - */ > - soft_timer_cancel(&timer->phys_timer, NULL); > - > - /* > * If we entered the guest with the vtimer output asserted we have to > * check if the guest has modified the timer so that we should lower > * the line at this point. Otherwise: Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx> M. -- Jazz is not dead, it just smell funny. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm