Only patch 5/5 fixes anything, and that's just a theoretical bug, but, IMHO, this series future-proofs and improves the maintainability of the code. See https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm-arm/msg27254.html for a TL;DR analysis that led to this series. Thanks, drew Andrew Jones (5): KVM: arm/arm64: tidy 'should sleep' conditions KVM: arm/arm64: replace power_off with mp_state=STOPPED KVM: arm/arm64: factor out common wfe/wfi emulation code KVM: arm/arm64: improve kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable KVM: arm/arm64: kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable: don't miss injected irqs Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 10 +++--- arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 +++-- arch/arm/kvm/handle_exit.c | 14 +++------ arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 8 +++-- arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c | 14 +++------ virt/kvm/arm/arm.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ virt/kvm/arm/psci.c | 32 ++++++++------------ 7 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) -- 2.13.5 _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
