On 8 September 2017 at 15:34, gengdongjiu <gengdongjiu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Peter/ shenglong, > What is your idea about it? We may need to consult with you about it. I agree with what I take to be James' general point that we should be careful to distinguish "KVM supports API A to do a particular operation on the guest" and "KVM supports API B to tell QEMU about certain events" and so on, and not just lump these all together under "host CPU supports RAS and so we turn all these on together and expose RAS to the guest regardless". I don't know enough about the details of RAS to be more specific than that general point of view. PS: your mail client doesn't seem to be doing the right thing with wrapping long lines :-( thanks -- PMM _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
