Hi Peter,
2017-06-23 18:18 GMT+08:00, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 23 June 2017 at 10:38, James Morse <james.morse@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> So the v8 ARM-ARM has two ways of indicating an external abort, KVM tests
>> bit 9
>> The v7 ARM-ARm has a '{D,I}FSR.ExT' bit, which I think is equivalent. Its
>> described as:
>>> An implementation can use the DFSR.ExT and IFSR.ExT bits to provide more
>>> information about external aborts.
>
> For instance, the Cortex-A15 TRM documents that it uses the ExT bit
> to distinguish AXI DECERR (decode error, ExT==0) and SLVERR (slave
> error, ExT==1) abort responses.
>
>>> This is what the v8 version must mean with its
>>> External abort type. This bit can provide an IMPLEMENTATION DEFINED
>>> classification of External aborts.
>>
>> Which I read as IMP-DEF classification 'as external', as opposed to your
>> reading
>> as an extra IMP-DEF classification for external aborts.
>
> I think gengdongjiu's reading is correct here: if this
> is an external abort then you can find out more info about
> exactly what kind of EA it is by looking at this bit, but
> you have to look at the FSC bits to be sure it is an EA first.
>
> The Cortex-A53 TRM documents that it uses the same SLVERR-vs-DECERR
> semantics for DFSR.ExT as the A15. It doesn't say so but it wouldn't
> be very surprising if its usage of ESR_ELx.EA was the same.
Arm Cortex-A53 may use this EA bit for AXI DECERR (decode error,
ExT==0) and SLVERR abort. but not all CPUs have the same semantics.
For example, Huawei's designed armv8.2 CPU is not that semantics
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
> _______________________________________________
> kvmarm mailing list
> kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
>
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
