Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: KVM: Allow unaligned accesses at EL2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/06/17 21:09, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 07:08:34PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> We currently have the SCTLR_EL2.A bit set, trapping unaligned accesses
>> at EL2, but we're not really prepared to deal with it. So far, this
>> has been unnoticed, until GCC 7 started emitting those (in particular
>> 64bit writes on a 32bit boundary).
>>
>> Since the rest of the kernel is pretty happy about that, let's follow
>> its example and set SCTLR_EL2.A to zero. Modern CPUs don't really
>> care.
> 
> Why do we set the A flag via SCTLR_ELx_FLAGS in the first place, only to
> drop that flag later on for both EL1 and EL2 ?

That flag is always cleared at EL1, never set. Actually, only EL2 uses
that macro to *set* flags. An alternative would be to do away with the
macro and use the individual flags, like the 32bit side does.

What do you think?

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux