On Wed, 24 May 2017 22:13:15 +0200
Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> We add two new fields in vfio_platform_irq: deoi and handler.
>
> If deoi is set, this means the physical IRQ attached to the virtual
> IRQ is directly deactivated by the guest and the VFIO driver does
> not need to disable the physical IRQ and mask it at VFIO level.
>
> The handler pointer points to either the automasked or "deoi" handler.
> This latter is the same as the one used for edge sensitive IRQs.
> A wrapper handler is introduced that calls the chosen handler function.
>
> The irq lock is taken/released in the wrapper handler. eventfd_signal
> can be called in regions not allowed to sleep.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> ---
> ---
> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
> index 831f0b0..2f82459 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
> @@ -148,11 +148,8 @@ static int vfio_platform_set_irq_unmask(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> static irqreturn_t vfio_automasked_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> {
> struct vfio_platform_irq *irq_ctx = dev_id;
> - unsigned long flags;
> int ret = IRQ_NONE;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_ctx->lock, flags);
> -
> if (!irq_ctx->masked && !irq_ctx->automasked) {
> ret = IRQ_HANDLED;
>
> @@ -161,8 +158,6 @@ static irqreturn_t vfio_automasked_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> irq_ctx->automasked = true;
> }
>
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_ctx->lock, flags);
> -
> if (ret == IRQ_HANDLED)
> eventfd_signal(irq_ctx->trigger, 1);
>
> @@ -178,6 +173,19 @@ static irqreturn_t vfio_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> +static irqreturn_t vfio_wrapper_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> + struct vfio_platform_irq *irq_ctx = dev_id;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + irqreturn_t ret;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&irq_ctx->lock, flags);
> + ret = irq_ctx->handler(irq, dev_id);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&irq_ctx->lock, flags);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int vfio_set_trigger(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev, int index,
> int fd, irq_handler_t handler)
> {
> @@ -208,9 +216,10 @@ static int vfio_set_trigger(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev, int index,
> }
>
> irq->trigger = trigger;
> + irq->handler = handler;
>
> irq_set_status_flags(irq->hwirq, IRQ_NOAUTOEN);
> - ret = request_irq(irq->hwirq, handler, 0, irq->name, irq);
> + ret = request_irq(irq->hwirq, vfio_wrapper_handler, 0, irq->name, irq);
Noting here that vfio-platform already requests an exclusive interrupt
(flags = 0), which I think is something that's going to need work for
vfio-pci since we'll request a shared interrupt by default if the
device supports DisINTx masking. If we're doing this special trick at
the GIC, we'll starve other devices if they share an interrupt.
> if (ret) {
> kfree(irq->name);
> eventfd_ctx_put(trigger);
> @@ -232,7 +241,8 @@ static int vfio_platform_set_irq_trigger(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev,
> struct vfio_platform_irq *irq = &vdev->irqs[index];
> irq_handler_t handler;
>
> - if (vdev->irqs[index].flags & VFIO_IRQ_INFO_AUTOMASKED)
> + if (vdev->irqs[index].flags & VFIO_IRQ_INFO_AUTOMASKED &&
> + !irq->deoi)
nit, strange linewrap
> handler = vfio_automasked_irq_handler;
> else
> handler = vfio_irq_handler;
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
> index 8a3cfa9..b80a380 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_private.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,8 @@ struct vfio_platform_irq {
> spinlock_t lock;
> struct virqfd *unmask;
> struct virqfd *mask;
> + bool deoi;
> + irqreturn_t (*handler)(int irq, void *dev_id);
> };
>
> struct vfio_platform_region {
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
