On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 10:04:35AM -0600, Baicar, Tyler wrote: > This is basically what I already had in v14...you asked to move it into a > different if-statement? https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/4/12/397 Well, clearly I've been smoking some nasty potent sh*t. :-\ /me goes and looks at the spec: "Bit 0 – Timestamp is precise if this bit is set and correlates to the time of the error event." So why are we even printing the timestamp when !precise? IOW, I think we should do: if (!(timestamp[3] & 0x1)) printk("%stimestamp imprecise\n", pfx); else { sec = .. min = ... ... } and print the actual values only when the timestamp is precise. Otherwise it has *some* values which could just as well be completely random. And it's not like we're reporting the error tomorrow - it is mostly a couple of seconds from logging to the fw pushing it out... -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply. _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
