Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] KVM: add kvm_request_pending

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 05/04/2017 19:39, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> Uses of vcpu->requests should already have barriers that take care of
>> the ordering.  I think the main reason for READ_ONCE() is to tell
>> programmers that requests are special, but predictable.
> 
> I don't know what to do with "special, but predictable", unfortunately.
> In fact, I don't even think I know what you mean.

I don't think it's special, but predictable.  It's atomic, but with
relaxed ordering.

Paolo
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux