On 14/03/17 16:05, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 02:24:33PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> As noticed by RMK in this thread[1], the hyp-stub API on 32bit ARM >> could do with some TLC (it cannot perform a soft-restart at HYP, and >> has holes in the hyp-stub support in a number of places). In general, >> it would be desirable for the 32bit behaviour to align on 64bit, if >> only to ease maintenance. > > What's the merge plan for this? If you're happy with it (together with Christoffer, Will and Catalin), I plat to take it through the kvmarm tree. Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny... _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
