Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> So we can have portable formatting of uint32_t types.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> lib/libcflat.h | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/libcflat.h b/lib/libcflat.h
> index bdcc561..6dab5be 100644
> --- a/lib/libcflat.h
> +++ b/lib/libcflat.h
> @@ -55,12 +55,17 @@ typedef _Bool bool;
> #define true 1
>
> #if __SIZEOF_LONG__ == 8
> +# define __PRI32_PREFIX
> # define __PRI64_PREFIX "l"
> # define __PRIPTR_PREFIX "l"
> #else
> +# define __PRI32_PREFIX "l"
OK this is bogus, but the failure is because of where we get uint32_t
from (hint using arm32 compiler on a arm64 system) so I got:
lib/pci.c:71:9: error: format '%x' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 3 has type 'uint32_t {aka long unsigned int}' [-Werro\
r=format=]
Which makes me think we should be more careful about including system
headers in kvm-unit-tests (done in 75e777a0).
--
Alex Bennée
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
