On Friday, December 16, 2016 4:54:33 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Specifically on ARM, going further makes things rather useless especially > > for build testing: with gcc-4.2, we lose support for ARMv7, EABI, and > > effectively ARMv6 (as it relies on EABI for building reliably). Also, > > the number of false-positive build warnings is so high that it is useless > > for finding actual bugs from the warnings. > > If you start with that activity now, there's indeed a massive amount of > warnings to look into. > However, I've been build testing various configs with m68k-linux-gnu-gcc-4.1.2 > and looking at the compiler warnings for years, so I only have to look > at new warnings. What's the reason for sticking with gcc-4.1? Does this actually work better for you than a more recent version, or is it just whatever you installed when you started the build testing? Arnd _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
