Re: [Qemu-devel] [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 06/10] arm/arm64: add initial gicv2 support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 12:20:06PM +0200, Auger Eric wrote:
> 
> 
> On 15/07/2016 15:00, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > Add some gicv2 support. This just adds init and enable
> > functions, allowing unit tests to start messing with it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arm/Makefile.common    |  1 +
> >  lib/arm/asm/gic-v2.h   | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  lib/arm/asm/gic.h      | 20 ++++++++++++++
> >  lib/arm/gic.c          | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  lib/arm64/asm/gic-v2.h |  1 +
> >  lib/arm64/asm/gic.h    |  1 +
> >  6 files changed, 166 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 lib/arm/asm/gic-v2.h
> >  create mode 100644 lib/arm/asm/gic.h
> >  create mode 100644 lib/arm/gic.c
> >  create mode 100644 lib/arm64/asm/gic-v2.h
> >  create mode 100644 lib/arm64/asm/gic.h
> > 
> > diff --git a/arm/Makefile.common b/arm/Makefile.common
> > index ccb554d9251a4..41239c37e0920 100644
> > --- a/arm/Makefile.common
> > +++ b/arm/Makefile.common
> > @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ cflatobjs += lib/arm/mmu.o
> >  cflatobjs += lib/arm/bitops.o
> >  cflatobjs += lib/arm/psci.o
> >  cflatobjs += lib/arm/smp.o
> > +cflatobjs += lib/arm/gic.o
> >  
> >  libeabi = lib/arm/libeabi.a
> >  eabiobjs = lib/arm/eabi_compat.o
> > diff --git a/lib/arm/asm/gic-v2.h b/lib/arm/asm/gic-v2.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000..973c2bf3cc796
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/lib/arm/asm/gic-v2.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
> > +/*
> > + * All GIC* defines are lifted from include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2016, Red Hat Inc, Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > + *
> > + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, version 2.
> > + */
> > +#ifndef _ASMARM_GIC_V2_H_
> > +#define _ASMARM_GIC_V2_H_
> > +
> > +#define GIC_CPU_CTRL			0x00
> > +#define GIC_CPU_PRIMASK			0x04
> > +#define GIC_CPU_BINPOINT		0x08
> > +#define GIC_CPU_INTACK			0x0c
> > +#define GIC_CPU_EOI			0x10
> > +#define GIC_CPU_RUNNINGPRI		0x14
> > +#define GIC_CPU_HIGHPRI			0x18
> > +#define GIC_CPU_ALIAS_BINPOINT		0x1c
> > +#define GIC_CPU_ACTIVEPRIO		0xd0
> > +#define GIC_CPU_IDENT			0xfc
> > +#define GIC_CPU_DEACTIVATE		0x1000
> > +
> > +#define GICC_ENABLE			0x1
> > +#define GICC_INT_PRI_THRESHOLD		0xf0
> > +
> > +#define GIC_CPU_CTRL_EOImodeNS		(1 << 9)
> > +
> > +#define GICC_IAR_INT_ID_MASK		0x3ff
> > +#define GICC_INT_SPURIOUS		1023
> > +#define GICC_DIS_BYPASS_MASK		0x1e0
> > +
> > +#define GIC_DIST_CTRL			0x000
> > +#define GIC_DIST_CTR			0x004
> you could add #define GIC_DIST_IIDR			0x008
> which can be found in arm-gic.h

I'll resync with the latest kernel headers.

> > +#define GIC_DIST_IGROUP			0x080
> > +#define GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET		0x100
> > +#define GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR		0x180
> > +#define GIC_DIST_PENDING_SET		0x200
> > +#define GIC_DIST_PENDING_CLEAR		0x280
> > +#define GIC_DIST_ACTIVE_SET		0x300
> > +#define GIC_DIST_ACTIVE_CLEAR		0x380
> > +#define GIC_DIST_PRI			0x400
> > +#define GIC_DIST_TARGET			0x800
> > +#define GIC_DIST_CONFIG			0xc00
> > +#define GIC_DIST_SOFTINT		0xf00
> > +#define GIC_DIST_SGI_PENDING_CLEAR	0xf10
> > +#define GIC_DIST_SGI_PENDING_SET	0xf20
> > +
> > +#define GICD_ENABLE			0x1
> > +#define GICD_DISABLE			0x0
> > +#define GICD_INT_ACTLOW_LVLTRIG		0x0
> > +#define GICD_INT_EN_CLR_X32		0xffffffff
> > +#define GICD_INT_EN_SET_SGI		0x0000ffff
> > +#define GICD_INT_EN_CLR_PPI		0xffff0000
> > +#define GICD_INT_DEF_PRI		0xa0
> > +#define GICD_INT_DEF_PRI_X4		((GICD_INT_DEF_PRI << 24) |\
> > +					(GICD_INT_DEF_PRI << 16) |\
> > +					(GICD_INT_DEF_PRI << 8) |\
> > +					GICD_INT_DEF_PRI)
> > +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> > +
> > +struct gicv2_data {
> > +	void *dist_base;
> > +	void *cpu_base;
> > +};
> > +extern struct gicv2_data gicv2_data;
> > +
> > +#define gicv2_dist_base()		(gicv2_data.dist_base)
> > +#define gicv2_cpu_base()		(gicv2_data.cpu_base)
> > +
> > +extern int gicv2_init(void);
> > +extern void gicv2_enable_defaults(void);
> > +
> > +#endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
> > +#endif /* _ASMARM_GIC_V2_H_ */
> > diff --git a/lib/arm/asm/gic.h b/lib/arm/asm/gic.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000..b1237d1c5ef22
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/lib/arm/asm/gic.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2016, Red Hat Inc, Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > + *
> > + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, version 2.
> > + */
> > +#ifndef _ASMARM_GIC_H_
> > +#define _ASMARM_GIC_H_
> > +
> > +#include <asm/gic-v2.h>
> to be moved in gic.c?

The idea is that we can strive to create a common interface for basic
gic features, as some unit tests will use such a minimal feature set
of the gic that it won't matter if it's a v2 or v3. Those unit tests
would then just include the generic 'asm/gic.h' and use generic
functions only. This series doesn't introduce any generic functions,
except gic_init, but going forward we may.

> > +
> > +/*
> > + * gic_init will try to find all known gics, and then
> > + * initialize the gic data for the one found.
> > + * returns
> > + *  0   : no gic was found
> > + *  > 0 : the gic version of the gic found
> > + */
> > +extern int gic_init(void);
> > +
> > +#endif /* _ASMARM_GIC_H_ */
> > diff --git a/lib/arm/gic.c b/lib/arm/gic.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000..64a3049c9e8ce
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/lib/arm/gic.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (C) 2016, Red Hat Inc, Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > + *
> > + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, version 2.
> > + */
> > +#include <libcflat.h>
> > +#include <devicetree.h>
> > +#include <asm/gic.h>
> gic-v2.h?

We'll need both -v2 and -v3, and gic.h does that for us. In the future
we may need gic.h too, so just gic.h seems like the better choice from
the start.

> > +#include <asm/smp.h>
> > +#include <asm/io.h>
> > +
> > +struct gicv2_data gicv2_data;
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic.txt
> > + */
> > +static bool
> > +gic_get_dt_bases(const char *compatible, void **base1, void **base2)
> > +{
> > +	struct dt_pbus_reg reg;
> > +	struct dt_device gic;
> > +	struct dt_bus bus;
> > +	int node, ret;
> > +
> > +	dt_bus_init_defaults(&bus);
> > +	dt_device_init(&gic, &bus, NULL);
> > +
> > +	node = dt_device_find_compatible(&gic, compatible);
> > +	assert(node >= 0 || node == -FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND);
> > +
> > +	if (node == -FDT_ERR_NOTFOUND)
> > +		return false;
> > +
> > +	dt_device_bind_node(&gic, node);
> > +
> > +	ret = dt_pbus_translate(&gic, 0, &reg);
> > +	assert(ret == 0);
> > +	*base1 = ioremap(reg.addr, reg.size);
> > +
> > +	ret = dt_pbus_translate(&gic, 1, &reg);
> > +	assert(ret == 0);
> > +	*base2 = ioremap(reg.addr, reg.size);
> > +
> > +	return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int gicv2_init(void)
> > +{
> > +	return gic_get_dt_bases("arm,cortex-a15-gic",
> > +			&gicv2_data.dist_base, &gicv2_data.cpu_base);
> what about the other possible compat strings. Is it safe to look only
> for that one?

Currently, yes. Currently we only care about mach-virt, and thus far
mach-virt uses only this. Let's only add new compat strings as we test
models that use them.

> > +}
> > +
> > +int gic_init(void)
> > +{
> > +	if (gicv2_init())
> > +		return 2;
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void gicv2_enable_defaults(void)
> > +{
> > +	if (smp_processor_id() == 0) {
> > +		writel(GICD_INT_DEF_PRI_X4, gicv2_dist_base() + GIC_DIST_PRI);
> I don't get this. There are (8*(GICD_TYPER.ITLinesNumber+1)) such
> registers. See irq-gic-common.c/gic_dist_config
> 
> More generally shouldn't we implement something like gic_dist_config and
> gic_cpu_config

So the gic*_enable_defaults functions are certainly places I could have
messed up. I appreciate the review trying to get it right. In the least
I should have commented my intentions better, because I hardly remember
them now myself... Here's what I was trying to achieve

1) Create an enable function for unit tests which don't really care about
   what's enabled, i.e. provide a functioning, but minimally configured,
   gic.
2) While using gic_dist_config and gic_cpu_config as inspiration, cut
   it down to just a handful of register writes in order to make it
   easy for unit test writers to understand on a quick read.
3) Only one cpu sets up the distributor.

I think you're right that I screwed up on gicv2's enable. I should have
an irq_nr, like I do for gicv3, in order to set all registers.

Also, in both the v2 and v3 cases I should probably improve how I
determine by whom and when the distributor is set up. Rather than
requiring only cpu0 to do the setup, and the secondaries to not even
try until it's done, I can probably let any cpu do it, and force the
others to wait until it's ready to setup the cpu interfaces.

I'll give this another pass...

Thanks,
drew

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Eric
> 
> > +		writel(GICD_INT_EN_SET_SGI, gicv2_dist_base() + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET);
> > +		writel(GICD_ENABLE, gicv2_dist_base() + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
> > +	}
> > +	writel(GICC_INT_PRI_THRESHOLD, gicv2_cpu_base() + GIC_CPU_PRIMASK);
> > +	writel(GICC_ENABLE, gicv2_cpu_base() + GIC_CPU_CTRL);
> > +}
> > diff --git a/lib/arm64/asm/gic-v2.h b/lib/arm64/asm/gic-v2.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000..52226624a2092
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/lib/arm64/asm/gic-v2.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> > +#include "../../arm/asm/gic-v2.h"
> > diff --git a/lib/arm64/asm/gic.h b/lib/arm64/asm/gic.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000..e5eb302a31b4d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/lib/arm64/asm/gic.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> > +#include "../../arm/asm/gic.h"
> > 
> 
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm



[Index of Archives]     [Linux KVM]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux